Gordon Brown's remarks: Your reaction
Prime Minister Gordon Brown has been caught on microphone describing a voter he had just spoken to in Rochdale as a "". What is your reaction to his remarks?
Sixty-five-year-old on a number of issues including immigration and crime.
As he got into his car, he was still wearing a broadcast microphone and was heard to say "that was a disaster" and when asked what she said, he replied: "."
In response, Mrs Duffy said: ". He's an educated person. Why has he come out with words like that?"
After listening to the recording, with his forehead resting on his hand, he told the Jeremy Vine show on ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ Radio 2: "Mr Brown later phoned Mrs Duffy to apologise.
Has your opinion of Gordon Brown changed? Should a private conversation remain private? Is this a defining moment of the election campaign or a side issue?
Page 1 of 33
Comment number 1.
At 28th Apr 2010, ian cheese wrote:The most refreshing thing about Gordon Brown is that he admits his mistakes & does not claim to be a saint-like Tony Blair! I might yet give him my vote!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 28th Apr 2010, Spindoctor wrote:Mountains and Mole Hills
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 28th Apr 2010, Rufus McDufus wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 28th Apr 2010, Askemwhy wrote:If the woman was a bigot (we have no way of knowing as we''ve not been given details of the conversation) then Brown should stand by his comments.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 28th Apr 2010, imustbeoldiwearacap wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 28th Apr 2010, BFG wrote:Why are people so shocked, Labour treats anyone that disagrees with their views on Immigration or Crime as bigoted, Racist or just wrong. Gordon Brown is just typical of the Middle Class liberal Elite who believe their own views are the ones that matter.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)
Comment number 7.
At 28th Apr 2010, pablofreudianus wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 7)
Comment number 8.
At 28th Apr 2010, Bruno wrote:I can't say I'm Mr Brown's biggest fan, but I do think that anyone's private conversation should remain so - private.
If you go earwigging you should expect to hear things you don't like.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 8)
Comment number 9.
At 28th Apr 2010, Red_xl wrote:It's a nothing issue as far as I'm concerned.
He's just frustrated, he's trying to win an election for goodness sake.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 9)
Comment number 10.
At 28th Apr 2010, ronreagan wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 10)
Comment number 11.
At 28th Apr 2010, Graham wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 11)
Comment number 12.
At 28th Apr 2010, madamsuper_e wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 12)
Comment number 13.
At 28th Apr 2010, Eponymous Cowherd wrote:Well done, Gordon.
You have single-handedly guaranteed that we won't have to suffer another Labour Government.
Thank you, thank you, thank you!!!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 13)
Comment number 14.
At 28th Apr 2010, JonD wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 14)
Comment number 15.
At 28th Apr 2010, bertsanders wrote:This is exactly how Politicians feel about the people. They set the rules and we must agree - once elected they become a benign dictatorship.
It could have been any of them, they do not wish to listen to public opinion
Mrs Duffy expressed an opinion which could have been heard anywhere - and if Mr Brown was prepared to listen he would find there are very many bigots.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 15)
Comment number 16.
At 28th Apr 2010, Joshmerryweather wrote:The whole point of this is not whether the woman was a bigot or not, my observation is that Gordon was annoyed that his stage managed walkabout with the people has now been seen for what it is..stage managed!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 16)
Comment number 17.
At 28th Apr 2010, grainsofsand wrote:This in my opinion typifies Labour, who appear by their actions to have utter contempt for White British people.Labour say one thing in public and another when they think people aren't listening.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 17)
Comment number 18.
At 28th Apr 2010, Peter me not the other one wrote:Gordon Brown has just thrown away the last hope he had of winning this election.
You can spin and spin but sooner or later the truth will out.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 18)
Comment number 19.
At 28th Apr 2010, William Wills wrote:Knowing the Brit. public, I expect many people won't mind too much about the actual comment, which was rather mil danyway. But if GB thought any of her comments were biggoted he should have said so to her face, rather than moan in the car. MP's don't have to agree with every memeber of the public they talk too, just be honest for a change rather than say one thing and think another!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 19)
Comment number 20.
At 28th Apr 2010, alan surman wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 20)
Comment number 21.
At 28th Apr 2010, rogers1892 wrote:I've not heard what she actually said, so he could be right in his views of her. Plus, if it turns out her views were biggoted, then this could be a major boost to his popularity, as was the case when 2 jags slapped that farmer guy!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 21)
Comment number 22.
At 28th Apr 2010, TB wrote:At last an indication to this man's vile character is in the public domain. As usual he is blaming others (the media, concerned grandmothers) for his failings. There is light at the end of the tunnel and we can look forward to a future without Brown.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 22)
Comment number 23.
At 28th Apr 2010, emmalt wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 23)
Comment number 24.
At 28th Apr 2010, Taz Devil wrote:The mistake she made was to mention immigration. None of the main parties are prepared to reverse our mass immigration problems and won't allow us to discuss it either.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 24)
Comment number 25.
At 28th Apr 2010, MrBeatnik wrote:Comments aside, I can't believe how the reporters followed the pensioner and didn't let her even answer her phone or get on with things... even at the end of te recording you could still see camera men chasing her down the street.
I think the reporters have acted worse than any flyaway comments.
PS, I don't like Brown :)
Complain about this comment (Comment number 25)
Comment number 26.
At 28th Apr 2010, Paul B wrote:This should not have happened. (a) He should have been told that his microphone was still active, (b) he should not have said it.
Do we really think politicians do not make remarks about us, negative as well as positive? We throw enough muck at them.
Sadly this will give the media, especially the anti New Labour press a field day.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 26)
Comment number 27.
At 28th Apr 2010, Dave Lloyd wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 27)
Comment number 28.
At 28th Apr 2010, Lady Jenny Beefer wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 28)
Comment number 29.
At 28th Apr 2010, grumpy wrote:Seems like we finaly found out GB's opinion of people who dare to disagree with his views.
The Lady only asked questions that millions of people would like to hear answered.
There was only one Bigot taking part in that discussion and it wasn't the lady.
It will not matter how many times he makes meaningless apologies, the damage is done.
I would have respected him far more if he had the guts to confess that what he said was what he really thought.
I have just used my postal vote, guess what??, it was NOT for NU-Lab or any other prospective totalitarian regime.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 29)
Comment number 30.
At 28th Apr 2010, nerdsunited wrote:Brown has apologised for upsetting Mrs Duffy. This is good. However, the question still remains: Is Mrs Duffy a bigot ? Was she prejudiced in her views and intolerant of the opinions of others ? Until we have the full details of the conversation between Mrs Duffy and Mr Brown, I can only commend him for apologising for causing upset.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 30)
Comment number 31.
At 28th Apr 2010, Stephen wrote:Elementary mistake for an experienced politician. Will cost Labour 0.5% on 6 May. His comment could have been a lot worse.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 31)
Comment number 32.
At 28th Apr 2010, Paul-HalfDegreeC-by2100 wrote:He`s finished.
Totally.
We have proof now of what we`ve long suspected.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 32)
Comment number 33.
At 28th Apr 2010, geekyTramen wrote:Should a private conversation remain private? Yes it should, but this conversation was NOT private - it was recorded on his microphone hence why we as the public and the media heard it being said. Surely he knows he should have kept quiet, until the microphone was removed and they had driven away? I know I've been frustrated and ranted after dealing with a customer at work, but this should be a vital lesson for all - remember never ever ever to utter another word like this UNTIL you're certain no one can hear you.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 33)
Comment number 34.
At 28th Apr 2010, Dr-G wrote:Can't believe Lord Mandy is saying that it was the heat of the moment kind of comment....
This is in response to a Labour supporter, asking fairly standard questions what most people are thinking...
Imagine Gordon's response if he had to hold talks heated with the Iranian or North Korean Presidents?
Based on that performance, he couldn't hold his temper as is no doubt a liability to this country
He has shown himself to be an embarrassment and can not ever be considered statesman like.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 34)
Comment number 35.
At 28th Apr 2010, stanblogger wrote:My guess is that 9 out of 10 politicians say things like Mr Brown said once they believe they no longer on air. As a ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ reporter said, many will be reacting by thinking "there but the grace of God go I"
We say that we want politicians to be more honest and say what they really believe, but they all know that if they did so, they would never win an election. Politicians are immersed in politics and have a much deeper understanding than the average member of the public, and almost all must be frustrated on occasions, by the naivety of the some members of the public, especially those that rely on the "red top" press for their information.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 35)
Comment number 36.
At 28th Apr 2010, Thomas Noel Thompson wrote:Mr Gordon Brown should not be prime minister of the UK. He should be in jail for financial crimes against the UK from when he was chancellor and now PM.Teflon Tony should be in the same cell.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 36)
Comment number 37.
At 28th Apr 2010, Jim wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 37)
Comment number 38.
At 28th Apr 2010, smokedfish wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 38)
Comment number 39.
At 28th Apr 2010, Have your say Rejected wrote:Gordon try not to put your foot in it again plsss, but I will not be basing my vote on comments gordon has said instead what his party intends to do.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 39)
Comment number 40.
At 28th Apr 2010, Stephen - Leader of STROP wrote:Who has not left a meeting, and turned to one's colleagues to let of steam. How would we feel if that was recorded and passed to the individual in question?
I am apalled that Sky News has broadcast this, no matter how "news worthy" it is: don't be suprised if you find politicians less willing to help you out in future
Complain about this comment (Comment number 40)
Comment number 41.
At 28th Apr 2010, frank220 wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 41)
Comment number 42.
At 28th Apr 2010, Go 4th and X wrote:Oh what a surprise! He should be good at spotting the characteristics of a bigot though, being one himself. The guy is a joke, an unelected joke, who needs booting out the door. Not that Clegg or Cammy are any better. Same shoes, different feet. I'm convinced that Lab/Lib/Con conspire behind closed doors anyway. For me there is just one big party containing the three, and their not too bothered about who leads it. All I can say is that the only thing learnt from World War 2 is that if you want to be a dictator, pretend to be a democrat. The only problem for them now is that it's becoming very transparent.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 42)
Comment number 43.
At 28th Apr 2010, Annabel wrote:I think this event has been blown massively out of proportion and I was shocked to see it as the ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ Website's top story. All the party leaders are under huge pressure and to see those images of Brown with his head in his hands made me feel so upset. He is only human, after all; I'm sure he's not the only politician to have made such remarks in private, he's just the unlucky one who had it transformed into a media frenzy.
This is not to ignore the understandable upset of Mrs. Duffy; of course, Brown never meant his comments to be heard by her and again, we all say things about others which we wouldn't say to their faces: that does not legitimize Brown's comments but it justifies their not being so ridiculously seized upon by the ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ and others. I think the media has made this experience much more unpleasant for Mrs. Duffy as well. Please stop this vicious kind of reportage and focus on the political issues at stake.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 43)
Comment number 44.
At 28th Apr 2010, soult wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 44)
Comment number 45.
At 28th Apr 2010, Antiochean wrote:So it was blame the aid, blame the media and blame the voter then?
Oh dear...
Complain about this comment (Comment number 45)
Comment number 46.
At 28th Apr 2010, Sue Denim wrote:This is a side of Gordon Brown we really needed to see. Many have alluded to it, others have denied it existed but now we have proof of the contempt he has for anyone who disagrees with him in any way. I hope the Labour waverers take note and act accordingly. I knew he wasn't fit for the job before this, now I know I'm right to believe it so.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 46)
Comment number 47.
At 28th Apr 2010, One in a million wrote:At last Gordon shows something of himself, rather than the manufactured/ false characature we see on our screens every day spouting propaganda.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 47)
Comment number 48.
At 28th Apr 2010, AndrewPB wrote:Very little surprises me about Gordon Brown and his comments today are no exception. I do not think he understands what the word apology means.
I quote .. "I do apologise IF I've said anything that has been hurtful".
Why the use of the word 'if'?
Well Mr. Brown, people may vote for you and your party and your record in government come polling day ... that's of course 'IF' they believe a word you say any more!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 48)
Comment number 49.
At 28th Apr 2010, quirkyspider wrote:I feel kind of sorry for the guy... I was never going to vote for him, but if you see the clip of the woman... moan moan moan, she just wouldn't give up.
No doubt the Brown haters will have a field day, and it is their reactions that would be more likely to influence me. I don't like to see people being kicked when they're down.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 49)
Comment number 50.
At 28th Apr 2010, Jim Stone wrote:Gordon is forever saying he listens. But he clearly is only using us to retain power...
The lady was correct in answering the question. She was right to question how the debt would be cleared... maybe she would do a better job!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 50)
Comment number 51.
At 28th Apr 2010, oakwoodbank wrote:"Speaking on Radio 2's Jeremy Vine show, Mr Brown said: "Of course I apologise if I've said anything that's been offensive and I would never put myself in a position where I would want to say anything like that about a woman I'd met."
What he means is he would never want to be heard publicly saying anything like that. Now you see what you will get if you vote for Gordon Brown - as two-faced as you can get (and to do it in Rochdale too!)
Complain about this comment (Comment number 51)
Comment number 52.
At 28th Apr 2010, Visiting Alien wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 52)
Comment number 53.
At 28th Apr 2010, Mike Turner wrote:Why was so much news time devoted to a single incident, a mistaken word, said in private, for which profuse apologies have been made in triplicate.
There is much bias at the moment against Gordon Brown and the Labour party at the ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ and its political comments department: I thought you were meant to be impartial.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 53)
Comment number 54.
At 28th Apr 2010, Brian Berlin wrote:Of course, Cameron never says anything like that..... the foreign-billionaire-owned Sun and Sky are crying with tears of happiness though. It's nothing, but expect great howls of outraged "shock" from the hypocritical right-whingers.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 54)
Comment number 55.
At 28th Apr 2010, ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ News wrote:Gordon Brown has arrived back in Rochdale to apologise in person to Gillian Duffy.
Watch live and see reaction to this meeting on the ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ website's rolling election coverage:
Complain about this comment (Comment number 55)
Comment number 56.
At 28th Apr 2010, paul doherty wrote:gordon, george ratner sends his commiserations
Complain about this comment (Comment number 56)
Comment number 57.
At 28th Apr 2010, Julie Baxter wrote:Could Gordon Brown have done anything more to shoot himself in the foot? What a bumbling two-faced fool that man truly is.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 57)
Comment number 58.
At 28th Apr 2010, Ursula Muir wrote:What gets me most is the hypocritical eagerness of the media to trivialise the issues as usual: the almost orgasmic joy of the pundits in having caught someone out.
The man's been on the stump for weeks, he's tired, he's irritable, he's got a lot on his mind. He's talking in private to someone - or so he thinks.
So the veil of pretence and make-believe is punctured for a moment and reality intrudes. So what?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 58)
Comment number 59.
At 28th Apr 2010, doilookthatsilly wrote:I see that GB has now arrived at Mrs. Duffy's house to make a personal apology -- does she have a stable door ?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 59)
Comment number 60.
At 28th Apr 2010, Vivebunny wrote:I'm not a great fan of Gordon, but it's painful to watch this happen to anyone. Poor guy.
I didn't like his radio interview when he said 'if, IF, I've said something ...' or whatever he said. Typical answer from a politian.
Poor, poor lady. She's right to ask what was bigoted with what she said, I'd like to know the answer to that too.
The other day people on Today programme were talking about Gaffs through the ages during election time, this seems to be a pretty big gaff and I would certainly think it'll cost Gordon the election.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 60)
Comment number 61.
At 28th Apr 2010, totallyunbiased wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 61)
Comment number 62.
At 28th Apr 2010, Brian Doran wrote:If we all spent our day wired to recording media we would have very few friends. Our politicians are only human.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 62)
Comment number 63.
At 28th Apr 2010, Stuart R wrote:Why all the fuss about this 'off the record' comment? Is it really any different than the way David Cameron turned his back on the student activist asking him questions the other day? Surely the Prime Minister proved himself the better and more polite politician by engaging in a conversation with this woman? Cameron seems to think that if someone disagrees wit his policy, (does he yet have one?) or asks a legitimate question he can just turn his back and all is well with the world, no I really fail to see how the PM's , perhaps ill judged, comments can cause such a furore
Complain about this comment (Comment number 63)
Comment number 64.
At 28th Apr 2010, ian wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 64)
Comment number 65.
At 28th Apr 2010, Nicky wrote:Sadly I think this is yet another Murdoch media set up. Brown ought to know the whole Murdoch press is out to get him and therefore he should have taken off the mike, but I KNOW that this is just the type of remark senior Tories make about voters and people in general so it is merely a 'letting off steam' in the height of the election when people are tired. If it goes on everyday in Labour it is a bit worrying as it shows Labour are becoming just like the Nasty Party's snobby sense of superiority and smearing anyone is fine to them and their Murdoch mates.
Of course if David Cameron made it Sky would simply have held it back which journalistically I believe they are supposed to do ethically.
This was not excusable I know but both the major parties do it. Interestingly it is not the kind of remark I have ever heard a Liberal or LibDem make as they are the nice people party by comparsion with the main 2 parties who are in it for straight power and will trample on anyone to get it. No one has joined the LibDems for an easy route to power (hitherto)!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 65)
Comment number 66.
At 28th Apr 2010, Chris wrote:This certainly hasn't coloured my opinion of Gordon Brown, it was a private comment and he had just been grilled in the street, he tried to talk to her but she just talked over him, she saw immegration as a drawback rather than a benefit, it sounds like she fits the description of a biggot to me. Too bad the media will twist it to make him look like the devil when he is a human just like the rest of us.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 66)
Comment number 67.
At 28th Apr 2010, SId Holder wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 67)
Comment number 68.
At 28th Apr 2010, WrekinAir wrote:Sadly this shows the massive stress and pressure all our senior politicians are under at this time.
It wasn't a conversation - it was two people talking AT each other, one putting her list of complaints and the other making his standard political statements which weren't what the lady wanted to hear.
She represented the real concerns of many older voters in an industrial urban area who are (or were) diehard Labour supporters. In that sense it was a golden opportunity for GB to address those issues which might see many Labour voters turning to the other main parties or even the BNP. And it was lost through his narrow approach to conversation, with GB preferring to make campaigh soundbites rather than engage with her.
But what it also seems to show, even more sadly, is that GB is a man with strong personal views who struggles to understand when others see things differently. And especially when they openly criticise his views in public. He just won't listen.
Nor does he understand that making those repetitive atatements and giving the statistics he has learned by heart do not answer the questions of individual voters.
I am right, says GB and woe betide those who disagree.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 68)
Comment number 69.
At 28th Apr 2010, Judie wrote:I really couldn't care less what Gordon Brown said when he thought he was speaking privately to his staff in his car. Partly because I don't think many of us can afford to throw stones here (thank goodness my private conversations aren't broadcast on 3 TV and radio channels), and partly because I'm not voting for Gordon Brown. I am voting Labour, however and I really wish that the media would stop running a presidential campaign and realise that Brown is the leader of the Labour party, not the embodiment of the Labour party. David Cameron seems like a nice guy but I will never vote conservative because I disagree with the way they want to run this country. Nick Clegg is a great speaker, but does that mean the Liberals are the right party to take Britain out of recession? It's not about a person, it's about policy.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 69)
Comment number 70.
At 28th Apr 2010, ART001 wrote:How can he possibly say 'he meant no offence'? He made the comment lucidly and vehemently. Would he apologise if he hadn’t been caught? Absolutely not. That's how Brown responds to those that want him in power. What hope for the rest of us...
Complain about this comment (Comment number 70)
Comment number 71.
At 28th Apr 2010, Steve wrote:No apology needed, the comments reflected his true opinions - Brown and his colleagues all seem to regard anyone who so much as mentions the word immigration as racists. We are not even allowed to discuss it. That head in the sand attitude and the abdication of responsibility by the major parties are precisely why parties such as the BNP will get a lot of votes, far more than they could otherwise hope or deserve to attract. The electorate now knows beyond a doubt Brown's true opinions and will judge his party on them.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 71)
Comment number 72.
At 28th Apr 2010, Spindoctor wrote:This is brilliant, you could not make it up
Complain about this comment (Comment number 72)
Comment number 73.
At 28th Apr 2010, mark_2002 wrote:It would be fine if he'd said it to her face but as 30 seconds previously he was asking after her grandchildren if shows him up to be a 2-faced back stabber.
Honesty is politics? From him?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 73)
Comment number 74.
At 28th Apr 2010, jeddahjim wrote:I am Labour voter but am also deeply concerned about the effects of immigration on our way of life as are millions of other people and Gordon Brown has just called me and millions of other people BIGOTS !! . I am afraid he has lost this one because he has exposed Labours deliberate social engineering to make the UK a multiracial society. Politicians can talk the talk and just get in their cars and drive away from places like Rochdale etc , they dont have to live in these places where life has changed so much that it is like living in another country. Mind you tories are no better as they want cheap labour and Lib Dems want us to all hug an immigrant. Think i will have to go with UKIP
Complain about this comment (Comment number 74)
Comment number 75.
At 28th Apr 2010, KevynR wrote:Unfortunately, some questions can't be asked now without being labelled either bigot, racist, homophobic et al. To hold virtually any views contrary to the PC liberal elite invites such a label now, though the terms themselves have become meaningless through overuse, being as they are often applied to anyone with a difficult or unwelcome question.
As for challenging the prime minister, well good for you Mrs Duffy, it's about time someone asked him some difficult questions and took him to task for wrecking the country.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 75)
Comment number 76.
At 28th Apr 2010, Muddy Waters the 2nd wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 76)
Comment number 77.
At 28th Apr 2010, Steve Westwood wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 77)
Comment number 78.
At 28th Apr 2010, Art wrote:C'mon...The man was miked up and an off the cuff remark about someone who sounds like a bigot was reported. Leave the guy alone..You are allowed to have views you know..
Complain about this comment (Comment number 78)
Comment number 79.
At 28th Apr 2010, Merlin from London wrote:What I find most telling about the clip was how it exposes the New Labour culture of blaming subordinates.
Brown's very first comment after muttering that the exchange was a disaster is to angrily say "Whose idea was that?". I doesn't seem to occur to him that the exchange might have been a disaster because of his own actions. He could have said "I didn't handle that well".
Does this explain why New Labour ministers never resign?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 79)
Comment number 80.
At 28th Apr 2010, garlicluva wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 80)
Comment number 81.
At 28th Apr 2010, ticktickticktickboom wrote:Is anyone seriously surprised at this? Politics in this country is grounded in self serving hypocrisy and doublespeak. No-one should wonder that respect for politics and politicians is at an all time low. There is no honour or honesty in either .
Complain about this comment (Comment number 81)
Comment number 82.
At 28th Apr 2010, Olof Palme in Weimar England wrote:A gaffe's a gaffe.
I suppose Brown & Co. could be blamed for not communicating the many nuances of immigration/emigration, EU/non-EU etc. prior to the campaign. Nevertheless, Duffy's `Eastern European' comments reminded me of my witnessing Pierre Trudeau on the Canadian campaign trail years ago. He was asked by a university student `why do we have to have so many foreign [lecturers]?' to which Trudeau instantly blasted into the microphone: `get that idiot out of here.' To applause. And no headlines.
So Brown is actually a bit of a shy coward in my personal view. Shy people can be seen, sometimes correctly, unfortunately, as impersonal bullies at times. As we have seen in the past.
The Tories might assume this will all swing their way because of Lib-Dem immigration issues but they ought not to count on it. There are actually ways for Lib-Dems to swing (enough of) the fallout their way.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 82)
Comment number 83.
At 28th Apr 2010, MacHiavelli wrote:Why should he apologise. He gave an opinion on the woman - what's wrong with that?
This is a farce.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 83)
Comment number 84.
At 28th Apr 2010, Barrowmucker wrote:It just goes to prove that the stories of his temper are correct. He is I'm sure a hard working person but he is extremely awkward in public and certainly does not have suitable public profile. He has said many times that he is listening to what concerns ordinary people, and this proves that that was just for PR purposes. What this lady said may offend some people but many many people in areas affected by the topics mentioned are a very very serious concern to many ordinary hard working citizens. Politicians must take these concerns seriously. GB's time is up, who will take over the Labour leadership after the 6th May.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 84)
Comment number 85.
At 28th Apr 2010, Jim Roper wrote:I'd say Gordon Brown just about sums up most politicians!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 85)
Comment number 86.
At 28th Apr 2010, shoong wrote:It just goes to show how this PM has become completely detached from the reality he has created for us.
Of course anyone who has differing views then our exalted leader must be a bigot.
She asked a good question, one which concerns a great deal of people in this country, not because they are bigoted or racist, but because they can see that the country cannot sustain the numbers pouring through our borders.
His comments make his stance clear: nothing will change.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 86)
Comment number 87.
At 28th Apr 2010, Paul wrote:Mandelson said, in regard to Brown's gaffe :
"It is very unfortunate that this remark that he didn't believe got picked up. But he should be judged on how he responded."
Is that not what is happening? Brown made a comment that I think any reasonable person would find fairly offensive, and now he is being judged for it. And in my opinion, it reveals him to be the arrogant, contemptuous ass he always appeared to be.
The sooner this dour misanthrope and his sycophantic lickspittles are removed from public office, the better.
Now, how does one go about undoing a Peerage...?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 87)
Comment number 88.
At 28th Apr 2010, MarkRotherham wrote:He's got an opinion, just like anyone else. I'm sure all of the party leaders have said similar, or worse. Gordon Brown was just unlucky enough to be caught. For me, this whole election is a side issue. I couldn't care less what any politician says.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 88)
Comment number 89.
At 28th Apr 2010, FIATslaves wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 89)
Comment number 90.
At 28th Apr 2010, Charlie Paynter wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 90)
Comment number 91.
At 28th Apr 2010, Phil Sears wrote:Having heard what she said, I think Brown was remarkably restrained. Of course there is no coincidence that it was a Sky News microphone that was left switched on is there! Perish the thought!! Stinks of Murdoch/Sky dirty tricks department - a complete set-up from start to finish?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 91)
Comment number 92.
At 28th Apr 2010, rockandhardplace wrote:Its all right he is visiting her now and will apologise in person. No doubt after a couple of promises (grants and benefits etc!) Mrs Duffy will emerge and state she is now voting Labour again. Job done, never mind! That is until the next time! However what we will not see for the rest of this campaign is Labour allowing Gordon to move anywhere without the obligatory balloons and placards espousing all things Labour.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 92)
Comment number 93.
At 28th Apr 2010, Julian Hall wrote:He wants to run the country? He can't even remember he's got a microphone on! Quite apart from that, isn't politics SUPPOSED to be about accepting thet people have different views and discussing them as rational adults, not throwing a fit when someone disagrees with you?
Sorry.. sorry... I'll go back to my fantasy world where that happens...
Complain about this comment (Comment number 93)
Comment number 94.
At 28th Apr 2010, Jim Mason wrote:If we're all honest, we all say this sort of thing if we think we're not being heard. I actually think it's quite mild. Gordon Brown is under a lot of pressure. Let's give him a break. To me, this just shows his human side, as if he's just a normal person. Do you honestly not think Cameron makes similar comments when the microphones are off him? This would not affect my decision to vote Labour or not one little bit.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 94)
Comment number 95.
At 28th Apr 2010, foscari wrote:Gillian Duffy is a typical "Lancashire Lass".She asked Mr Brown some very pertinent questions and he after some Brown smirks,he treated Mrs Duffy with his usual contempt.In eight days time we will show Mr Brown, the contempt we have for him.For a start you will see the Labour, North -West seats fall like ninepins and the rest of the country will follow.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 95)
Comment number 96.
At 28th Apr 2010, SSnotbanned wrote:defo looks like a woman to me...
Complain about this comment (Comment number 96)
Comment number 97.
At 28th Apr 2010, Cathar Country wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 97)
Comment number 98.
At 28th Apr 2010, lijee wrote:For Godsake,Does the Prime minister has to be a saint!!!!I had many experiences where people say differently in public and private.That is human nature.Is he not allowed to express himself? atleast privately!!!He is a great man .Atleast he appologised..............Istill support him.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 98)
Comment number 99.
At 28th Apr 2010, corum-populo-2010 wrote:Finally - the Labour Party are exposed as sexist and ageist?
If that elder lady's comment came out of the mouth of a young male - very different response from the PM me thinks?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 99)
Comment number 100.
At 28th Apr 2010, Mark Broughton wrote:I have suspected for a long time that Our elected politicians privately hold us in comtempt, Gordon Brown has now confirmed this.
What worries me more is that any anyone who has a legitimate concern about levels of immigration is labled a Bigot. This plays right into the hands of the extreme right wing.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 100)
Page 1 of 33