成人论坛

成人论坛.co.uk

Talk about Newsnight

Debates

Newsnight Special: Sir Menzies Campbell

  • Newsnight
  • 13 Sep 07, 02:04 PM

Sir Menzies CampbellSir Menzies Campbell and the Liberal Democrats have had a tough few months since Gordon Brown took over as Prime Minister.

Next week, in a Newsnight special, Sir Menzies Campbell will be quizzed by our correspondents about his leadership and what he proposes for Britain. We want to know what you would like us to ask. Let us know here and we'll try and include some of your questions in the programme.

Comments  Post your comment

  • 1.
  • At 03:14 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • Majid Salim wrote:

Do you think Tony Blair should be tried for war crimes in Iraq?

  • 2.
  • At 03:14 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • Andrew Smith wrote:

I am a Libdem supporter but wonder what it will take for the British public (and media) to take the party seriously. What is Sir Menzies going to do to address this?

  • 3.
  • At 03:15 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • geva blackett wrote:

What policies will you introduce to shed your party's image of being teflon coated and all things to all men

Why are you backtracking on the Lib Dem's pledge of a referendum on the EU Constitution when the document is 96% the same and over 80% of voters from all parties want a referendum?

  • 5.
  • At 03:18 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • D Simms wrote:

Please advise if disproportional representation is democratic and if it undemocratic should we support an undemocratic system.

  • 6.
  • At 03:20 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • Andrew France wrote:

With the reported level of crime falling across the board, except in the one area of violent crime, isn't the "We Can Cut Crime!" campaign a waste of resources when there are more important public issues?

  • 7.
  • At 03:21 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • Jamie Cooke wrote:

In light of Gordon Brown's 'Big Tent' approach to Government and David Cameron's dragging of the Conservatives towards the centre of the political spectrum, what can, or do, the Liberal Democrats offer to the voters of the United Kingdom that is distinctive from either of the other two main parties?

  • 8.
  • At 03:21 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • Red Barchetta wrote:

Sir Menzies Campbell live on Newsnight! Oh be still my beating heart! How can Channel 4 News compete with such paltry offerings as live interviews with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad ..

  • 9.
  • At 03:22 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • Paul Evans wrote:

Do you believe that someone who is considering which party to vote for at the next election can gain enough information about the Liberal Democrats to make an informed choice. It seems to me that they are always responding to something rather than setting any agenda. I also find the charade of PMQs almost embarrassing to watch as it is so contrived that I feel we would be better served to do away with it and the only people who really enjoy it are those in the chamber.

  • 10.
  • At 03:22 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • Jeremy Wilson wrote:

The LibDems are missing a trick here. With Cons and Labour virtually identical in the way their policies are safe and steady, but inneffective, you could really exploit the gap in the market for common sense policies that will make a real difference to the well being of this country...eg Immigration - let's have a limit, Green issues - instead of taxes we want action, limit the number of flights for example, Prisons - let's have as many as we need and more just in case, Yobs - round them up and take mobile phones off them!

  • 11.
  • At 03:22 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • Laurence Brass wrote:

Question to Ming Campbell.

You quite rightly sacked Baroness Tonge as a Party spokesman in the House of Lords when she purported to express some sympathy for suicide bombers. Since then she has upset even more people by claiming that the West and "our party" is in "the grip of Jewish money". How then do you account for the fact that she has recently been re-appointed as a spokesman on health issues for the Party in the Lords?

Are you scared to enforce discipline?

  • 12.
  • At 03:23 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • Tom Aldridge wrote:

Question for Sir Menzies.....Are the Lib-Dems still passionate/paranoid particularly concerned with'proportional representation'?
And would they adopt the Old Labour Party's Clause 4. P.F.I.s and privatisation of monopolies are anathema to the British public!
Believe me - 'promise to bring back into public ownership transport energy, water, health etc. etc." and they're home and dry! Even in 'middle England!'

  • 13.
  • At 03:23 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • Gerry Harper wrote:

Now that Gordon Brown is starting to bring the troops out of Iraq , what will the Lib-Dems do when they campaign in Next Years Local Elections.

For the past 4 years their leaflets have been full of pictures of Tony Blair, George Bush and stories about Iraq. Will they ever tell local people what they stand for in local elections , instead of wittering on about how bad everybody else is and how saintly they are !

  • 14.
  • At 03:25 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • Cordula von Eye wrote:

How difficult is it for the Liberal Democrats to maintain their patch in the political landscape at the moment, with Labour and Tories moving into the Centre?

  • 15.
  • At 03:25 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • Nathan Eakins wrote:

How independent are the MTHR studies/findings and will Evan Harris one day regret his 'good news' quote?

  • 16.
  • At 03:25 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • Terry CLARK wrote:

I would like to know if Sir Menzies ever read the "Treaty of Rome" Government white paper in 1957, and then read it a second time, but reading between the lines. I did, and fifty years later I am still at a loss to see what it offered my Country, other than what is on offer today. Nothing said, written or done in that fifty years leads me to think my original stance is wrong.

Terry Clark, L'ISLE-SUR-LA SORGUE, France

  • 17.
  • At 03:32 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • John wrote:

I would like to ask Mr. Campbell the following questions:
1-If he is elected as Prime Minister, what does he intend to do about the problem of immigration?
2-What does he inted to do with the NHS mess that has taken over the country?
3-What are his views of people with disabilities? What does he inted to do with them?
4-What does he inted to do about the "greying" of the United Kingdom (meaning as people grow older)? Does he inted to put them into homes for the elderly?

  • 18.
  • At 03:33 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • Anthony Martin wrote:

I have a question for Sir Campbell. Simple really: Why does he bother?

  • 19.
  • At 03:34 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • Kevin Glynn wrote:

Please could you ask Sir Campbell if he would abolish water fluoridation should the Liberal Democrats attain power.

It is high time Britain abondoned the ludicrous practice of 'poisoning' the public water supply.

That is all.

Kevin Glynn

  • 20.
  • At 03:34 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • Terry CLARK wrote:

Did Sir Menzies ever carefully read the Treaty of Rome, Government White Paper published in 1975?

I could find nothing in it then, or since on many re-readings, or in any other Treaty published since. Nothing that leads me to believe my original feelings are wrong.

Regardless of what politicians tell us, a European Superstate was planned; eventually, from day one.

Terry Clark, L'ISLE-SUR-LA-SORGUE, France.

  • 21.
  • At 03:38 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • Sarah Clayton wrote:

Around 30% of the UK's carbon emissions come from domestic housing (electricity use, and gas) - and there are only a relatively small proportion of homes that still need to have loft insulation or cavity wall improvements (a parliamentary answer stated that eight million people lack cavity wall insulation and 6 million lack roof insulation). The rest of the housing stock loses substantial amounts of energy, and will continue to do so unless active measures are taken to cut energy loss. What can be done to insulate older houses better, and how will the funds be found to do so (or what incentives will there be to make people install more complex insulation techniques). Without significant - though-difficult-to-achieve - improvements in energy loss by domestic dwellings, Britain has little chance of making savings of 80% CO2 emissions by 2050. What policy measures do the Lib Dems suggest?

  • 22.
  • At 03:39 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • maygrove wrote:

The Liberal Democrats will always be the third largest party. As a result its influence in national politics will always be limited. Now that Labour is looking as though its majority will at best be reduced significantly, should the LibDems not align themselves much more closely with Labour to ensure it can influence the policy agenda in the next parliament much more actively as part of a coalition government?

  • 23.
  • At 03:39 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • charis dunn wrote:

If Labour sits at the centre on economic issues and the Tories are courting the green vote, what distinguishes any of you from each other without reference to the past and the war in Iraq? Can you as leader forge a new sense of purpose? Or is it time for a younger candidate who can change politics from astroturf to grassroots?

  • 24.
  • At 03:41 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • Richard Moore wrote:

Are the Lib/Dems to the left of the Right of the Labour party. I am very confused

  • 25.
  • At 03:47 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • Iain Mackenzie wrote:

Does the Right Honourable member agree that there is no longer any point in the Liberal Democrats and that their return to organising church fetes and running rotary clubs will be much appreciated by the voting public?

  • 26.
  • At 03:58 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • mark simpson wrote:

A barrage across the Severn Estuary could go a long way towards reducing carbon emissions, in line with the Lib Dems ambitious target of a 94% reduction by 2050 without nuclear power. What does Sir Menzies expect from the Sustainable Development Commission's forthcoming report on the matter, and would the Lib Dems support such a project if it was economically viable?

  • 27.
  • At 04:05 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • Chris Mills wrote:

I would like to ask -
When is he going to step down and let a more youthful, dynamic and intouch person take over as leader. He has made the party a weak, stale and out of touch rabble.
ex- Liberal Voter

  • 28.
  • At 04:15 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • wrote:

I want to ask Sir M Campbell if he will try to have any new Government Policies built with a more defined outline, no loopholes, some meat on their bones, with clear and concise guidelines which people can follow and relate to with ease?

As housing is top of the agenda with government at present, will there be a unifying of all of housin policy documents relating to this industry with a common denaminator reference, as at present these policies seem all over the place, full of contradictions and with more loopholes than a seive making it easier to manipulate the system.

  • 29.
  • At 04:23 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • Roger Skinner wrote:

The leaders of Britain's 3 main parties act in accordance with the principle:- "if we worry about the small things, perhaps the big things will go away"

Does mr Campbell (a) know what the big things are and (b0 have any notion of how to send them away?

  • 30.
  • At 04:25 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • Michael Booth wrote:

I left the UK to live in Saxony, mid-Germany at the end of the Thatcher years when I was thoroughly disillusioned and pessimistic about Britain's future. I must say I'm rather impressed with Angela Merkel's performance in comparison with Maggie's so would be interested to know what Sir Menzies thinks has changed during the Labour years and what he would do to entice me, as a pensioner of nearly 70 years, back to me native shores?

  • 31.
  • At 04:37 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • john morris wrote:

Dear Sir,What are your thoughts about the Missiles and Radar being positioned around Russia by the U.S.ofA. Governmemt and are you still in favour of the Trident Missile System not being updated/replaced? yours faithfully john MORRIS

  • 32.
  • At 04:40 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • victor sutton wrote:

The government seem to be distancing itself from their previous founders and allies the trade unions.If traditional labour voters help to get the liberal democrats elected will the unions get a more sympathetic ear from you?

  • 33.
  • At 04:51 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • Tony Tefford wrote:

Does Mr. Campbell agree with the proposals of the Tory Party Quality of Life Committee? Would Mr. Campbell support the construction of HS2(the North/South High-Speed (rail) Route)in order to encourage people to use the train rather than the aeroplane on the London to West Midlands - the North West - Central Scotland axis?

  • 34.
  • At 05:16 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • Tony Pegg wrote:

I'd like you to ask Mr Campbell what he would do to address the growing inequalities between those benefits afforded to the Scots (free tuition fees, free elderly care, lower class sizes, higher social spending per capita) and the rest of us, particularly the English who have no Parliament to represent them.

  • 35.
  • At 05:25 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • Paan Ming-to wrote:

Are there any circumstances in which the Lib-Dems would conceivably join up with Labour in government e.g. iin the event of a hung election? Then, would you consider joining with Labour if they agreed to one important condition - that is to seriously put before the country an electoral change to Proportional Representation?

  • 36.
  • At 05:28 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • Paan Mingt-to wrote:

Are there any conceivable conditions in which the Lib-Dems would join up with Labour in government, e.g. in the event of a hung election result? Then, would you consider joining with Labour in government if they agreed to the condition of seriously putting to the country a change in the electoral process to Proportional Representation?

  • 37.
  • At 05:47 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • Andy Smith wrote:

Which is more likely: The lib dems winning the next election or going into the next election with a new leader?

  • 38.
  • At 06:08 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • brossen99 wrote:

How are you going to explain the power cuts and a 50% rise in electricity bills if the electorate are foolish enough to ever vote you into power and you reach your renewables target whilst letting nuclear wither on the vine.

  • 39.
  • At 06:17 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • David Perkins wrote:

Does Mr Campbell agree with me that the current escalation of Russian military action in the air, Europe being held ransom almost by the Russian energy monopoly and growing political restrictions on Russian citizens concern him. If so, how does he believe that the many problem can be tackled to stop this giant rising again to Polaris the world?

  • 40.
  • At 06:55 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • christopher noble wrote:

Why do the Liberal Democrats advocate a local income tax if the Poll Tax was so unpopular?

  • 41.
  • At 06:57 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • harry roberts wrote:

I support proportional representation but can he explain how this would work in practice and what the the Lib Dems preferred mechanism is?

I am against the national list system where parties propose a list of 100s of their proposed representatives who, starting from the top, are assigned seats according to their proportion of the vote.

The constituency system, in some form, should be retained so that each MP knows they have to face the voters directly rather than focusing their political skills on getting higher up their party's list.

Voters may broadly support a party but must be free to vote for someone else if they dislike the local candidate.

Why not have multiple, overlapping constituencies so that voters have a choice of who they can approach with an issue?

Greater transparency or education is required about the criteria used to define constituency borders.

Any form of voting is where the people express their sovereignty. Voting should be made easier AND more secure. Electoral fraud of any kind should be recognised as treachery and punished accordingly.

The job of MP should become attractive to those who can use it to do good, rather than those just seeking a political career. How about halving the number of MPs and doubling their funding - with their accounts published quarterly and no other sources of income permitted?

The horse-trading of coalition building that follows elections in countries that have forms of PR results in a govt that no one has voted for. There should be some form of electoral validation by voters of a proposed coalition; coalition parties should not be empowered to change the govt at whim and self party interest without facing the voters. Govt should be more representative so that we, the people, can accept it and it's perhaps unpopular actions. But not so representative that it cannot govern.

  • 42.
  • At 07:37 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • Brian J Dickenson wrote:

Does Menzies truly believe that his party stands the remotest chance of being elected this century.

  • 43.
  • At 08:04 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • olutayo olubi wrote:

The Labour party is enjoying its best run ever, not only as the party to contend with but also as a party that knows its onions too well in UK politics. Does the Liberal Democrats have what it takes to dislodge the party?

  • 44.
  • At 08:16 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • Tommy wrote:

War is not good doing.
War is murder of human being.
So Iraq war is bad thing.
Immediately stop the Iraq war.

  • 45.
  • At 08:20 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • Tommy wrote:

War is murder of human being.
Immediately stop the Iraq war.

  • 46.
  • At 09:28 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • Jeremy Cassidy wrote:

TRIDENT - YES or NO? !

Aircraft carriers - Yes or NO?

US Star Wars missile system bases in Britain - Yes or No?

  • 47.
  • At 11:17 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • Alex Goodship wrote:

Have the Tories stolen the Lib Dems thunder on the Environment? The Lib Dems paper on the environment came out recently and was completely unreported, yet the Conservatives'paper has been reasonably well covered.

What are the Lib Dems offering us on the environment that the other parties aren't?

  • 48.
  • At 11:24 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • matt wrote:

I am a libdem, but sometimes i wonder about the direction the party is taking. What would you say to those who claim the party is becoming an haven for the exiled far-left?

  • 49.
  • At 11:37 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • Guy wrote:

I'm 44, male, white, heterosexual and English. I'm not much of a political animal but I do like to keep abreast of things. The colour of someone's skin or their religious beliefs are of no interest to me

I feel totally disenfranchised by this country because of the way "special interest groups" seem to hold so much of the governments attention.

Too often I see examples of petty rules and regulations (health and safety being a classic example), or a wish to not be seen to upset a certain group or part of society, create a situation where normal British life is put on hold or ignored completely.

What would you do to restore my faith in this country?

  • 50.
  • At 11:39 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • Revd Dennis Nadin wrote:

Do the Lib Dems believe that to have any chance of equal opportunities there has to be a substantial redistribution of wealth and resources from the rich to the poor. If so when are the party going to produce policies which enable this to happen.

  • 51.
  • At 11:44 PM on 13 Sep 2007,
  • John Snegley wrote:

Will you explicitly rule out forming a coalition government with Gordon Brown after the next election?
If not, why not?

As a marginal and perennial third party, wont the Lib Dems always be trying to be all things to all people?

  • 52.
  • At 12:12 AM on 14 Sep 2007,
  • wrote:

At General Election, does the PRE- SELECTION OF CANDIDATES by the parties, allied to the whipping system, weaken REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY?

  • 53.
  • At 12:12 AM on 14 Sep 2007,
  • Tony Telford wrote:

This is not a comment but is an apology. I addressed Sir Ming as "Mr. Campbell" in my question posted at 16.51. I sincerely apologise and have absolutely no idea why I was so apparently ignorant.

  • 54.
  • At 12:16 AM on 14 Sep 2007,
  • wrote:

Does Menzies Campbell agree with the following definition: POLITICS IS THE ART OF SELF-DECEPTION, WRAPPED IN THE CRAFT OF DECEIVING OTHERS - FOR THEIR OWN GOOD.

  • 55.
  • At 12:39 AM on 14 Sep 2007,
  • Idris Francis wrote:

Question for Sir Menzies Campbell:

Is there any limit to your determination and that of your party to remove from the British people their right to govern themselves? Anything that even you would not be prepared to say or do, however ludicrous?

  • 56.
  • At 10:23 AM on 14 Sep 2007,
  • Leon Patten wrote:

How will you convince myself as a Labour voter to switch to the Liberal Democrats. After all, you cannot really be taken seriously as a legitimate political party in British politics. Do you have any policies that could attract me to your party. My view is that what the Liberal Democratic Party really needs is a young, bright and honest leader that can really challenge both the Government and the Conservatives, and the same time, offer sceptical voters a real alternative.

  • 57.
  • At 10:39 AM on 14 Sep 2007,
  • Welsh Dragon wrote:

What does The Lib Dems have in mind to what they will do for us pensioners having to struggle on a basic pension.

  • 58.
  • At 10:49 AM on 14 Sep 2007,
  • Alan Spencer wrote:

If the re-named EU Constitution is such a good thing for Britain, why are you going back on your support for a referendum?
It seems to me that the only reason can be that the argument for creating a United States of Europe must be so weak and flawed that you know it would be rejected by the British people in the same way that it was previously rejected by the people of France and Holland.
Please do not say that it is a different document - I have read both and they are substantively the same.

  • 59.
  • At 11:04 AM on 14 Sep 2007,
  • Amanda Nelson wrote:

Politically, is the so-called 'middle' ground now just 'muddle' ground, seeing that parties of all political persuasions now want to claim it? How do we make sense of it? Please discuss...

And, while I have the chance, you've been the butt of blatant ageism since you've taken office.....is this a case of your party political opponents spouting equality of opportunity in their manifestos, yet resorting to cheap personal jibes when they sense an easy target?

  • 60.
  • At 11:04 AM on 14 Sep 2007,
  • Aitken Brotherston wrote:

Question for Ming Campbell
With Brown having reneged on the promise to hold a referendum, the issue has moved more onto public trust in politics and politicians. Why are you now further confirming the untrustworthiness of politicians by supporting his refusal?

  • 61.
  • At 11:33 AM on 14 Sep 2007,
  • Charlotte wrote:

Immigration is a subject at the top of most peoples' agenda. The majority of people are of the opinion that it is out of control, & that we are being 'swamped'. Are you prepared to abandon political correctness, & tackle this subject head on?

  • 62.
  • At 01:19 PM on 14 Sep 2007,
  • Liz Deacon wrote:

Mr Campbell
If you were elected as Prime Minister and hence a highly influential member of the Commonwealth Community, what would you do about President Mugabe?

  • 63.
  • At 01:34 PM on 14 Sep 2007,
  • Peter Cranie wrote:

I'm writing from the Green Party Conference in Liverpool.

If the Lib Dem promises about taking action on Climate Change are to be believed, then the attitudes of local Lib Dem led councils have to be changed.

What action will Mr Campbell take against rogue Lib Dem council leaders that promote air travel between cities in the UK instead of rail travel?

  • 64.
  • At 01:47 PM on 14 Sep 2007,
  • Dominic wrote:

Dear Sir Ming,

How will you deal with ignorant Daily Mail-reading fools, who believe that immigrants, asylum seekers and 'Health and safety' are destroying Britain, without alienating a large proportion of the voting public, of whom they seem to represent a depressingly large part?

  • 65.
  • At 03:02 PM on 14 Sep 2007,
  • Silkstone wrote:

re#64


Ming will be able to answer this one standing on his head whilst playing the bagpipes and singing 'There'll Always Be An England' in a Scottish accent.

No doubt he will suggest allowing these 'ignorant fools' to continue to revel in their irrational opinions because after all they only represent something like a mere eighty per-cent plus of a population of sixty million.

The circulation figures of the DM are obviously grossly understated and require updating.

  • 66.
  • At 04:18 PM on 14 Sep 2007,
  • Howard Spencer wrote:

Would Sir Menzies have invited Lady Thatcher around for tea? Which past prime minister would he most like to have round for tea and why?

  • 67.
  • At 06:08 PM on 14 Sep 2007,
  • Martin Langley wrote:

Michael Howard was a very much better leader of the conservative party than David Cameron is or is ever likely to be...

-Discuss

  • 68.
  • At 07:24 PM on 14 Sep 2007,
  • Roland wrote:

Given that the chances are high of a hung parliament after the next Election and you have said that you would not go into coalition with the Tories, I should Labour rather than wasting my vote on the LDs shouldn't I?
Roland

  • 69.
  • At 07:31 PM on 14 Sep 2007,
  • Ruth Mayer wrote:

Sir Menzies Campbell.


please ask him when he is going to resign.

can' t be too soon!

  • 70.
  • At 07:51 PM on 14 Sep 2007,
  • Roland wrote:

Given that the chances are high of a hung parliament after the next Election and you have said that you would not go into coalition with the Tories, I should Labour rather than wasting my vote on the LDs shouldn't I?
Roland

  • 71.
  • At 09:54 PM on 14 Sep 2007,
  • Terry Durrance wrote:

Why are the Liberal Democrats so keen to surrender the sovereignty of our country in order to become a federal state of Europe?
Do they not think it strange that all our political parties want to be in power - only to then give that power away to the EU?

  • 72.
  • At 01:05 AM on 16 Sep 2007,
  • Idris Francis wrote:

Question to Menzies Campbell

Given your performance so far as leader, are you still determined to sacrifice your party to satisfy your ego?

This post is closed to new comments.

The 成人论坛 is not responsible for the content of external internet sites