³ÉÈËÂÛ̳

If we were allowed to play games in the office

Comments

1. At 02:02 PM on 20 Nov 2007, Aperitif wrote:

   Oh blimey how addictive! Best score about 90 :-(

   Why do I laugh so much every time I crash???

2. At 02:06 PM on 20 Nov 2007, wrote:

   72
   

3. At 02:09 PM on 20 Nov 2007, Perky wrote:

   Oh dear, Eddie. I can feel the productivity of the nation decreasing as I type. Isn't it amazing how addictive a simple game can be?

   Perky (419 - but getting in lots of practice!)

4. At 02:27 PM on 20 Nov 2007, Sally D wrote:

   684 and counting.
   Thanks Eddie, another excuse to avoid working. Lets not tell Alistair Darling about it though, he needs to concentrate at the moment.

5. At 02:37 PM on 20 Nov 2007, wrote:

   I would claim it was my score - but I won't. Ritchie, our production planner has achieved 874.

   The nation will be starved of pizzas for one day - you have been warned

   Almost as much fun as this.......

6. At 02:38 PM on 20 Nov 2007, wrote:

   Ritchie just reached 1216 - he's gone of to do some work to celebrate. Phew! We can eat again.....

7. At 02:42 PM on 20 Nov 2007, JimmyGiro wrote:

   1105, but then I read the instructions, so maybe that was cheating :P

8. At 02:48 PM on 20 Nov 2007, Mermaid wrote:

   119, and a helicopter with a severe headache and a very bruised nose.
   And I'm learning to fly a (very basic) indoor model helicopter.

9. At 02:58 PM on 20 Nov 2007, Big Sister wrote:

   I'm trying for 502 ;o)

10. At 02:58 PM on 20 Nov 2007, Mermaid wrote:

    Now 344. Nose healing.

11. At 03:06 PM on 20 Nov 2007, Aperitif wrote:

    Stoppit! Stoppit! Stoppit!!!

12. At 03:12 PM on 20 Nov 2007, wrote:

    Ritchie appears to have given up working for the day - hogh score update: 1482
    Eddie - can you spare anyone to help keep the wheels of industry turning?

13. At 03:29 PM on 20 Nov 2007, Charlie wrote:

    Phew... Thank goodness your "Post" Eddie, clears up that "little" problem..!

    Y'see, someone'd told me Eddie, that they'd seen you playing, in the office, with your "Little Chopper" and comparing your "performance" with the Editor's...

    And, I thought... well, I thought...

14. At 03:32 PM on 20 Nov 2007, JimmyGiro wrote:

    1224... I'm getting angry now.

15. At 03:47 PM on 20 Nov 2007, Steve K wrote:

    Try this if you have a microphone on your PC:

    "https://www.weebls-stuff.com/games/shout+n+dodge"

    If not, try this "https://www.weebls-stuff.com/games/dogfight"

16. At 03:55 PM on 20 Nov 2007, JimmyGiro wrote:

    @ 12

    This means war!

17. At 04:12 PM on 20 Nov 2007, wrote:

    Grrrr 126.... I'm supposed to be starting evening surgery in a minute!!!

18. At 04:21 PM on 20 Nov 2007, Chris Ghoti wrote:

    gosh I'm glad that my computer says it can't get whatever this is

19. At 04:21 PM on 20 Nov 2007, nikki noodle wrote:

    are we still counting

    (or should that be: ard dwe sdill coudtindg??!)

    And do you usually go over, or do you prefer to whizz underneath???

    n-n

    380

20. At 04:28 PM on 20 Nov 2007, Frances O wrote:

    You are VERY NAUGHTY, Eric, and I hope that the PM office will soon install a Naughty Step.

    Closely modelled on the Today proggie's Naughtie Step, nae doot. (Anyone see last night's TV thingie on it? The prog, not the step)

    Big Sis, I dived straight in (several times. Crash!) and got mashed up a lot before I realised where this could lead (see above for proof!). So I may read the instructions.

    Or I might resist.

    Har, har

21. At 04:29 PM on 20 Nov 2007, Chris Ghoti wrote:

    gosh I'm glad that my computer says it can't get whatever this is

22. At 05:11 PM on 20 Nov 2007, Paul Gledhill wrote:

    608 but a colleague just passed the 1000 mark!

23. At 05:13 PM on 20 Nov 2007, Dr Hackenbush wrote:

    Had a few goes and got 266.

24. At 05:43 PM on 20 Nov 2007, Belinda wrote:

    704 - appears I fly helicopters about as well as I drive. [I presume that this was an eco-friendly low-carbon emission helicopter?].

25. At 06:09 PM on 20 Nov 2007, Little Red wrote:

    what have you done?!

26. At 08:49 PM on 20 Nov 2007, mittfh wrote:

    Ho hum, so you've discovered Copter...

    Only about 5 years after most schoolchildren - it's one of those flash games that crop up everywhere, leading to a constant game of cat-and-mouse between the pupils (finding the games) and the teachers/technicians (adding the URLs to their filter list). Sixth formers were particularly fond of this one...

    AFAIK, the two most common at the moment are:
    The Adrenaline Challenge (trust me, the title's ironic)
    Line Rider

    Both the originals, and various modified versions.

27. At 09:20 PM on 20 Nov 2007, Bill'n'Ben wrote:

    Eddie,

    502 ,OH GOD is this an omen. It's much better with the real things, they make a much louder bang when they crash.

    B'n'B

28. At 10:15 PM on 20 Nov 2007, Unqualified Loon (the original) wrote:

    532 - and my head hurts!

29. At 10:34 PM on 20 Nov 2007, Val P wrote:

    158, but a load of laughs. Actually I think it's hysteria, I make the same mistake every time!

30. At 11:09 PM on 20 Nov 2007, wrote:

    I don't play this sort of game. But if I did, I might have scored 612.

    Sid
    

31. At 11:14 PM on 20 Nov 2007, Stewart M wrote:

    608 and I was on 502 honest for ages. Must send this to "everyone"

32. At 11:28 PM on 20 Nov 2007, Stewart M wrote:

    What's the smallest score you can get? I reckon 19 is the lowest.

33. At 08:41 AM on 21 Nov 2007, wrote:

    My favourite score is 38. Or do I mean median ...

    Sid
    

34. At 10:18 AM on 21 Nov 2007, wrote:

    Ah! Now I get it! Here on the 'office' computer, I got 865 second time out. It seems ability is measured in inverse proportion to processor speed......

    xx
    ed

    P.S. Stewart's right. It seems impossible to get less than 19. ;-)

35. At 10:59 AM on 21 Nov 2007, wrote:

    Now this really is interesting*. I find I get much higher scores with the sound on ...

    Sid

    *values of interesting may vary

36. At 10:22 PM on 22 Nov 2007, Chris Ghoti wrote:

    mittfh @ 26, it is very very unkind ever to point out to media folk that they are trumpeting as 'new' something many other people have known about for years.

    In the same way one shouldn't say 'I told you so' when they notice the security of huge databases, or rather the lack of it. Let's just be glad that they *do* finally catch up, eh?

37. At 10:33 PM on 22 Nov 2007, Chris Ghoti wrote:

    mittfh @ 26, it is very very unkind ever to point out to media folk that they are trumpeting as 'new' something many other people have known about for years.

    In the same way one shouldn't say 'I told you so' when they notice the security of huge databases, or rather the lack of it. Let's just be glad that they *do* finally catch up, eh?