³ÉÈËÂÛ̳

³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ BLOGS - Sport Editors
« Previous | Main | Next »

FA Cup fourth-round picks

Post categories: ,Ìý

Roger Mosey | 13:41 UK time, Thursday, 11 January 2007

After the first-round draw for this year's FA Cup I had a call from an old friend up north.

He's the groundsman at a non-League club and they'd just secured a juicy home tie - so were we planning to cover it? It's obviously a question people ask after every draw.

For lower-league clubs the TV picks can make a massive financial difference to them (and, for the record, we didn't cover my mate's club) - while for the giants it's about fitting kick-off times into high profile slots in the schedules which will get them some of the biggest viewing figures of the season.

For us, it's a vigorous internal debate about what's the right choice for our audiences...

The decision's taken by the football team - Niall Sloane our head of football with his editors, and I join in from time to time. The format is that the ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ has the first choice of tie; then , our partners on the FA contract, have second choice; and we then have picks three and four. But all this has to be approved not just by but crucially by the local police: if they don't think a particular kick-off time is safe, they have a veto.

Once that's all sorted, some of the editorial choices make themselves. We'd have been daft not to have as our first choice last Saturday at 5.15pm in the third round - just as, on the other side, Barnet v Colchester would have been rather low on the list, whatever the undoubted virtues of those two teams.

But there's a range of other factors too: do our choices have a good geographical spread? We wouldn't want to be entirely based in north-west England or in London - and we also don't want the same teams in absolutely every round unless it's unavoidable.

Is there some of the romance of the Cup? All-Premiership ties win the largest audiences, but we're proud of being at Weymouth and Salisbury and Tamworth this season too - with viewing figures there stronger than for many live Premier League games.

Equally, we're influenced not just by the teams but by who has home advantage. Chelsea v Macclesfield is less attractive than Macclesfield v Chelsea. And even if we don't get an upset, we'd like a tie that's reasonably balanced: the most difficult thing for our commentators is to breathe life into a game where the favourites are 2-0 up after eight minutes.

So here's what we've decided for the Fourth Round. Our first pick was Manchester United v Portsmouth, which will play in the Saturday teatime slot. Sky have gone for Arsenal v Bolton, and we've then opted for Chelsea v Nottingham Forest on Sunday afternoon and finally for Luton or QPR v Blackburn on Saturday lunchtime. I should say additionally we've chosen Newcastle United v Birmingham for our third-round replay, and you can see that game on ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ One next Wednesday night.

I know there won't be universal agreement with these picks - this blog is here precisely so you can debate what we do - but we hope you'll enjoy the fourth-round ties on 27 & 28 January. Audiences in the third round were up on last year, with Liverpool v Arsenal peaking at over 8m, so we'd like that trend to continue.

³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ iD

³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ navigation

³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ © 2014 The ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.