Matt Southall: Ex-Charlton chief executive told to pay 拢21,000 in costs

Image source, Rex Features

Image caption, Matt Southall was removed from board of owners ESI in March
  • Author, Simon Stone
  • Role, 成人论坛 Sport

Former Charlton Athletic chief executive Matt Southall has been told to pay 拢21,000 costs after he admitted unlawfully changing the status of directors at the club鈥檚 parent company, East Street Investments.

In addition, Southall was ordered not to use ESI鈥檚 authentication code on the Companies House website for 12 months.

At a remote court hearing lasting over an hour on Friday, it was claimed by a lawyer acting on behalf of ESI that Southall鈥檚 conduct last weekend, when the changes became apparent, was a 鈥榗lear attempt鈥 to disrupt the current sale of the club to Manchester-based businessman Paul Elliott, which the hearing was told is still to be completed.

In a witness statement presented to the court by Southall鈥檚 solicitor, it was claimed Southall been lied to about the sale of ESI, which he remains a director of and has a 35% stake in, which was the reason for his actions.

However, this was dismissed by Judge Richard Pearce, who said the wording of a press release issued on 10 June indicated a sale was yet to be completed and this had been backed up by a witness statement provided by another ESI director, Chris Farnell, on 13 July.

All four directors removed as ESI directors by Southall, plus current owner Tahnoon Nimer, have since been restored as directors on Companies House.

A statement released by Farnell on behalf of ESI said: "ESI is delighted that a complete and comprehensive judgement has been given against Mr Southall for his unlawful actions in the removal of the directors.

"In the ruling at the Manchester Court today the judge found that Mr Southall鈥檚 actions were entirely unlawful and that there was no basis for his attempts to remove the directors or change the service.

"The club also confirmed that there had been no misleading of the Court by the directors of ESI and was heavily critical of the statement served by Mr Southall鈥檚 lawyer on Mr Southall鈥檚 behalf.

"Mr Southall did not attend court nor provide any witness statement. The judge also ordered costs in the sum of 拢21,000 against Mr Southall."