³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ Online and social media
Post categories: ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ Online
| 13:43 UK time, Tuesday, 6 October 2009
Last Tuesday, I attended an illuminating session organised by the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism at the University of Oxford, with the support of, our own College of Journalism on 'The rise of social media and its impact on mainstream Journalism'.
The panel (The Guardian's , The Telegraph's and the ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳'s ) reflected on the dynamics created by the web's unique ability to support the 'many to many conversation'. It was a lively discussion with unanimous agreement that 'social media' enables the telling of better stories and making better relationships.
User engagement (or what we have long thought of as audience involvement) was a recurrent theme last week. On Friday night I was at the BFI participating in a discussion on web production, with members of our audience. It was a useful forum to ruminate on topics such as ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ Online reaching its 12th birthday this December, the current challenges of digital literacy and social exclusion, the worrying lack of viable business models for commercial online publishers, and the creativity and new forms of storytelling made possible by the web.
Afterwards, mingling and chatting, I was asked about press reports about I had read the stories earlier last week with bemusement and the has clearly .
Our continuing concern is to make ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ Online better for our users. This includes looking at how we can genuinely make ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ Online part of the web and meet our users growing expectations that they can contribute in different ways to our site. A number of ideas are in train; including allowing users to add comments to news stories as they can at many sites, including and . However, those ideas are aimed at allowing us to keep pace with what users have come to expect - they do not add up to a radical" social" overhaul!
The ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ has always sought a close relationship with the people who provide its income. Interacting with audiences is intrinsic to our heritage even if the means of doing so constantly evolve. I remember debates with viewers via letter, arguing in response to complaints and closely monitoring daily call logs during my programme making days. These kinds of feedback helped - and still help - programme makers to shape and sharpen the output for which they are responsible.
Newer forms of audience participation are audible or visible across our output, whether in Nicky Campbell's compelling morning show on R 5 or in . And, of course, feedback is the u.s.p of shows such as the appropriately named Feedback on Radio 4 and Points of View on ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ ONE. In these programmes, value for the whole audience is provided by the contributions of a few - and this is a pattern we want to be part of ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ Online in future.
Mark Thompson talked recently of the importance of the ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ as a 'shared, independent, not-for-profit public space.' Key to this is the power of digital media to build deeper and closer relationships with our audiences. And ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ Online is uniquely positioned to enrich and sustain this 'public space.' The web, with its developing tools and functionality provides a great platform for a mutually enriching, many to many conversation.
The Apprentice Predictor is a recent example. Users could predict which apprentice they thought was going to be fired, - a good example of how social functionality can add interest and drama to our best-loved shows. We hope to build on this kind of interaction with Strictly Social, a recent addition to the Strictly Come Dancing site. Users will be welcomed to the site by an avatar of Judge Len Goodman, and can submit their own ratings for the contestants as well as select their favourite moments while the show is on air to view afterwards.
So, we are looking at a number of ideas. But in addition to asking what our users want we also need to be aware of the impact anything we do might have on other UK sites and services. Our aim is to be part of the much more joined up internet that is emerging; not compete with other service providers. Indeed, in order to become more part of the web we need to interact successfully with other sites and services - and that means effective collaboration. From being a digital repository for the ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳'s digital content, ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ Online aims to co-exist more fruitfully with other services and significantly improve the way it signposts and embraces content and services that exist outside the ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳.
More ambitious, but also more complex perhaps, are emerging plans to work with partners in the sharing of technology and other service elements like metadata. This is the thinking behind many of our partnership proposals - such as and Project Canvas. The same principles and intentions are informing our thinking on social media.
Seetha Kumar is Controller, ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ Online
Comment number 1.
At 6th Oct 2009, mariaa444 wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 6th Oct 2009, oscardelsanto wrote:Engaging the audience via the social media is of paramount importance for the traditional mass media. Just one caveat: communication is always a two-way process, and fruitful engagement is not likely to take place under participants feel they are being taken into consideration.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 7th Oct 2009, Ed Lyons wrote:If you do allow comments, you really must provide a way to highlight good comments! The few articles you do currently allow comments on have some really interesting comments from people who know what they're talking about - e.g. . I assume these comments are carefully chosen. If you allow all and sundry to stick their comments on the bottom of every page (like most sites do), these interesting comments will be lost.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 7th Oct 2009, TV Licence fee payer against ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ censorship wrote:#3. At 00:12am on 07 Oct 2009, Ed Lyons wrote:
"If you do allow comments, you really must provide a way to highlight good comments!"
In your opinion...
Personally I find nothing more annoying than someone trying to sway peoples opinion of an article (or what ever) by highlighting their own opinion by means of article ranking etc. I, and I'm quite sure most people are, quite capable of reading the text and making my own mind up based on that text and that text alone.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 7th Oct 2009, Ed Lyons wrote:Boilerplated: But imagine how many comments there will be on a popular ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ news article? 1000? More? Look at the average quality of Have Your Say comments too... I'm not sure user-ratings works either (based on HYS anyway). I'd say some editorial control would be beneficial (but expensive)...
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 9th Oct 2009, Russ wrote:What happened to the ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ Online Access Forum announced by the ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳'s COO Caroline Thomson at the summit on 17th April?
Russ
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)
Comment number 7.
At 10th Oct 2009, halfamo wrote:"...of course, feedback is the u.s.p of shows such as the appropriately named Feedback on Radio 4 and Points of View on ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ ONE. In these programmes, value for the whole audience is provided by the contributions of a few - and this is a pattern we want to be part of ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ Online in future."
Ironic! On the one hand you seem to be closing down opportunities for users to comment. (It would be nice if I could provide comments on Radio 5, but every avenue that used to be open for such comments has been systematically closed.) And yet you claim you want users contributions to part of Online's future. One of these is obviously false, which?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 7)
Comment number 8.
At 11th Oct 2009, The Phazer wrote:Oh god - I can't think of anything worse than wasting licence fee money moderating comments on every ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ News story. It'd be like extending the festering pit of idiocy that is Have Your Say a thousand fold.
There are plenty of places on the web for people to write innane dribble. The licence fee is much better spent on actual original, professional content like better journalism in the first place.
Please, please don't do this.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 8)
Comment number 9.
At 15th Oct 2009, Nick Reynolds wrote:Hi Russ (comment 6) - here's your answer.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 9)
Comment number 10.
At 20th Oct 2009, Nick Reynolds wrote:halfamo - comment 7 - the Five Live blog now has a post to discuss scehdule changes.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 10)
Comment number 11.
At 24th Feb 2010, GK wrote:Well said. Social media enables telling stories better and making relationships stronger and better.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 11)
Comment number 12.
At 30th Mar 2010, U14402580 wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 12)
Comment number 13.
At 12th May 2010, U14460911 wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 13)
Comment number 14.
At 3rd Oct 2010, Gaz wrote:All this user's posts have been removed.Why?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 14)