Devonwall Bill amendments not debated
The Parliamentary Voting System and Constituency Boundaries Bill rumbles on. MPs tonight ran out of time before assorted "hands off Cornwall" amendments could be debated. I'm not sure how or when Cornwall's MPs will now get a chance to change the Bill (might there be possibilities in the Lords?) before they have to decide whether to vote for it, or against it, at the third and final reading.
Comment number 1.
At 21st Oct 2010, Peter Tregantle wrote:So long as the likes of George are seen to be trying is all that matters, results has never been high on his wish list, it's all an act, like Martyr Mike, for them a mention in the house is breaking news.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 21st Oct 2010, P_Trembath wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 21st Oct 2010, P_Trembath wrote:Graham, did they just run out of time, or were they "talked out" of time?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 21st Oct 2010, youngcornwall wrote:It is a good job MPs ran out of time Graham, wasting anymore valuable time on this would be quite unnecessary, I am sure our MPs have more important things to do, like running the country.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 21st Oct 2010, Rob wrote:It such a sad day not only for Cornwall but also for democracy. Cornwall's millenia old border stands to be cast aside without even a proper debate and vote in parliament. This government seems to be so keen on rushing through their long list of policies that they have no time for due process, public consultation or proper debate in the Houses of Parliament.
I don't think much will be made of this now throughout the UK, but I think a lot of historians and analysts will look back on this week and wonder why major changes to constituency boundaries and the setting in motion of a referundum to changes the centuries old voting system was brushed over in less than a week. This is one of the most significant bills to affect the constitution in the UK fo a long time which does not sit easily with the way it was railroaded through parliament. Not to mention the diverse elements of the bill that were so loosely bound together.
Quite what the House of Lords will make of these many issues, will be very telling. There also seemed to be something quite prophetic in Tristam Hunt's warning about the possiblity of a judicial review in regard of the constituency boundaries, including Cornwall or as he put it in the 'historic Duchy of Cornwall'.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 21st Oct 2010, AccurateChronometer wrote:You may well yet prove to be correct in your analysis,Rob. This cynical conflation of two bills into one and crude attempt at politically motivated constituency and constitutional gerrymandering on the back of a token gesture voting format referendum is very far indeed from being a done deal. If the Conservative Party and Liberal Democrats have their political wits about them they will recognise this particular hybrid Bill is ill-conceived, poorly constructed and damaging and disruptive to the UK as a whole and withdraw it to avoid further Conservative Party, Liberal Democrat Party and Coalition Government embarrassment, disarray and shame.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)
Comment number 7.
At 22nd Oct 2010, Peter Tregantle wrote:Cornwall's millenia old border stands to be cast aside
If you say it enough times people might become brainwashed ask the people of Cawsand and Kingsand about the border, because it remains a fact the border until just over 100 years ago was on west side of Tamar and Devon brings more employment to east cornwall than the rest of cornwall does.
Second fact is this has nothing to do with English county borders
I could continue but I just know silly remarks will follow, all based on myths and King Arthur rather than facts
Complain about this comment (Comment number 7)
Comment number 8.
At 22nd Oct 2010, Andrew Jacks wrote:It doesn't take a clairvoyant to see where this heading
Hint - its the Tamar not Amazon
Complain about this comment (Comment number 8)