paper monitor
a service highlighting the riches of the daily press
paper monitor gets the feeling that someone has been reading the work of our esteemed colleague mr michael blastland
the daily mail headline snoring men twice as likely to die early is typical newspaper fodder the kind of conclusions that are drawn from scientific reports and then oversimplified
but the subheading on the article displays some appreciation of those bothersome hidden depths stories so often have
it says but is noisy sleep a sign of poor health or the cause
elsewhere many papers resisted the opportunity to play around with photographs of the former mrs ritchie with her new squeeze jesus luz
the sun didnt
it says and thats really all you need to know
regular readers might wonder what on earth has got into paper monitor today with this whole bally lack of any kind of punctuation
even now one is braced for emails saying i didnt pay my licence fee for you not to have punctuation
but its all an experiment in the times theres a who in these post lynne truss days was enraged with a missing apostrophe on the signs at st johns close where he lives
so much so that he took vigilante action and inked the missing apostrophes in
the surprising thing is the hostility he has encountered from some of his neighbours one of whom called him a vandal and a graffiti artist
maybe just maybe this is the start of a revolt against pedants
paper monitor of course has no views either way but will be on the lookout for any more evidence of a pedantry backlash and this is a blunt tactic to try to flush it out
putative apostrovigilantes comment away and to kick things off dont hyperlinks count as punctuation
Comment number 1.
At 18th Aug 2009, messyblonde wrote:Aaaaah! This brings me out in a hot flush. I want to become an apostrovigilante, only I'm scared.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 18th Aug 2009, Marquee wrote:[PerHaps-WE...nEEd+tO_OVERcompensate*IN'tHe=ComMentS|IN{order~TO}reDRESS(the BALaNCE)?]
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 18th Aug 2009, Shetland James wrote:Rabbits die
Rabbit's die.
Means two completely different things, sounds exactly the same, without punctuation would be written the same.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 18th Aug 2009, trevthesparky wrote:Can (someone) please explain the seemingly (new) practice of putting (words) in brackets which are (essential) to the proper (construction) and legibility of (sentences) as if they were (not) put(there) by the original (author) of the (sentence) or as if the bracketed (words) do not (belong) there?
It's really (annoying) me as it is becoming (more) and (more) prevelant in (newspapers) and online (articles)
I appreciate that the foregoing may annoy you but I have (bracketed) words merely for (effect)
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 18th Aug 2009, Marquee wrote:Personally I think are stealth punctuation. They're there, but nicely hidden away unless you hover your cursor over them. i.e. yes, you cheated!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 18th Aug 2009, Joe wrote:What Is Really Interesting Is That In Excluding Punctuation You Omitted All Initial Capital Letters At The Beginning Of What Would Have Been Sentences I'm Not Sure Capitals Count As Punctuation I Remember Being Taught At School About Full Stops And Capital Letters FSCL But Arent The Capitals Just A Consequence Of The Punctuation The Full Stops
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)
Comment number 7.
At 18th Aug 2009, Candace9839 wrote:how very e e cummings
Complain about this comment (Comment number 7)
Comment number 8.
At 18th Aug 2009, Marquee wrote:Now Paper Monitor is getting adventurous, who's expecting tomorrow's Paper Monitor to be written entirely in txt spk?
Following on from #4 and #6, I think once the discussion is finished here; We Need To Come Up wth the (perfect) sentance whats got all hour pet Peeves innit!!!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 8)
Comment number 9.
At 18th Aug 2009, scuzzy983 wrote:Can you understand what's been written in today's Paper Monitor?
Yes.
Was there any punctuation?
No.
Is punctuation necessary for comprehension?
No.
Therefore, is punctuation an important part of our written language?
Not really, no.
Don't make such a big fuss over something so trivial.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 9)
Comment number 10.
At 18th Aug 2009, JoviAli wrote:The thing that bugs me the most (and ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳, you're guilty of this) is when something belonging to someone is typed as, say, James's when we all know that it is written James' just pronounced as James's... if we are to start typing everything phonetically then this could get very long-winded.
And I'm all for, correct, puntuation. We have to have standards of some sort.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 10)
Comment number 11.
At 18th Aug 2009, Marquee wrote:Hmm #9 scuzzy983...
Can you understand what's been written in today's Paper Monitor?
Yes - but it took longer to read and fully comprehend. I bet it took longer to write also, needing to double-check for unintended double meanings etc.
Was there any punctuation?
No, I'll agree with that one, ignoring hyperlinkery
Is punctuation necessary for comprehension?
No - in this case. Plenty of other examples could be found where this wouldn't unambiguously be true.
Therefore, is punctuation an important part of our written language?
Definitely - but not to the extent of over-zealous pedantry. If it's not important, why did you use it in your post? :) (sorry, a little emotipunctuation there)
Don't make such a big fuss over something so trivial.
Didn't know we were - seemed mainly a light-hearted conversation in the spirit of the original article.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 11)
Comment number 12.
At 18th Aug 2009, shiveringphilmk wrote:No. 10 - James's is correct. You only ommit the s when the word is a plural so James' could only be used if there was something belonging to more than one James.
I like to write "photo's" as this tricks most pedants. You can then explain that it is an abbreviation of photographs.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 12)
Comment number 13.
At 18th Aug 2009, Jamie_Brown_ wrote:We should all purchase these:
Complain about this comment (Comment number 13)
Comment number 14.
At 18th Aug 2009, Marquee wrote:Nice one Jamie! Of course for the really perverse, those stickers can be used for both purposes. You can go around sticking random apostrophes on valid signs to annoy pedants. Equally pedants can go around adding missing apostrophes onto errant signs to help reduce their blood pressure.
Of course you can also use the waste material around the stickers to good effect - if it's a white sign you can cover over existing apostrophes by tearing off bits.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 14)
Comment number 15.
At 18th Aug 2009, Gorbynet wrote:#12 shiveringphilmk: Either usage (James' or James's) is acceptable. The recommendation in Fowler's Modern English Usage is that the trailing 's' is omitted in words where the final sound is a hard 's', pronounced as 'z', such as James, Jesus, Moses, etc.
I'll get my coat...
Complain about this comment (Comment number 15)
Comment number 16.
At 18th Aug 2009, skittledog wrote:i cant help feeling that for this to have been a true test of our ability to read without any form of punctuation or imposed pauses paper monitor ought also to have forgone line breaks such that there was no way to enforce a sentence end on any reader
ofcoursethistheorytakentoitslogicalconclusionwouldalsodispensewithspaces
Complain about this comment (Comment number 16)
Comment number 17.
At 18th Aug 2009, Marquee wrote:Of course then there's the famous paragraph that went round inboxes a few years back. Let's have a Ppaer Mnotoir in this style...
Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrdige Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht frist and lsat ltteer is at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae we do not raed ervey lteter by it slef but the wrod as a wlohe.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 17)
Comment number 18.
At 18th Aug 2009, itskjd wrote:surelyspacesarepunctuationsoyourentryshouldhavebeenwrittenlikethis
Lynn Truss has a poor explanation of the 's and this leads to the mistake of shiveringphilmk -"You only ommit (sic) the s when the word is a plural".
Possession can be denoted by writing 's in all cases i.e. the s is an integral part of showing possession. When pronouncing a possessive noun ending in s (whether singular -James's - or plural -babies's) we do not need to enunciate the final s.
Could someone please explain how to write and pronounce the result of the two men called Moses possessing anything?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 18)
Comment number 19.
At 19th Aug 2009, alexwilson82 wrote:#9 - of course punctuation is necessary. Consider the following:
A woman without her man is useless.
Some may consider that this sentence is suitably punctuated, but others may argue that it should be appended thusly:
A woman: without her, man is useless.
The colon and comma make quite a lot of difference!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 19)
Comment number 20.
At 19th Aug 2009, alexwilson82 wrote:Ju'st a's a 'sugge'stion, maybe to en'sure we don't mi's's any apo'strophe's (and thu's incur the wrath of tunbridge well's re'sident's), we 'should add one before every in'stance of the letter 's in a 'sentence.
And on another note:
Why does Earl's Court station have an apostrophe in its name, but Barons Court doesn't?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 20)