Gym will fix it for British boxing
If is to be believed, it wasn't so long ago that Britain's finest amateur boxers went into battle barefoot and bedraggled compared to their counterparts from money-bags Albania.
British boxers, , didn't even have tracksuits until , the agency that dishes out public money to elite sport, issued them with £25 outfits last year.
This revelation came a month before the most promising Olympic boxing team for half a century left these shores for Beijing. And Gavin, Britain's first ever world champion, was the star.
I remembered this on Sunday while driving back from because it is very unlikely a GB boxer will ever again have cause to moan about his (or her) clobber.
Clearly, much has changed.
Gavin infamously failed to keep his date with Olympic destiny ().
Shorn of its best medal hope, the team looked wobbly for the first few days in Beijing before gathering itself and landing this country's finest haul in the ring for years.
The good vibes didn't last long, though, and soon all three Beijing medallists - , and - and bright prospect had joined "Funtime" Frankie in the pro ranks.
The changing of the guard in terms of talent was matched by a revolution in leadership. Tired of refereeing fights outside the ring, UK Sport decided enough was enough.
No longer could a situation be tolerated that saw the sport's elite at war with its grass-roots. But that is exactly the scenario in which Gavin & co were operating.
At the centre of all this - although not necessarily the cause of it - was Terry Edwards, the inspirational head coach of the Olympic boxing programme.
Edwards was a GB coach when , and he was in Amir Khan's corner when .
Superb results at the were followed by a . Gavin's gold was the pick of three medals won in Chicago. But behind the scenes things were going from bad to worse.
Edwards' strained relationship with the , which provided the lion's share of Team GB's boxers and coaches, was now past repairing, and matters weren't much better with the Scots and Welsh.
As rows about , local coaches' access to their boxers and escalated, just about the only consolation for UK Sport, which was bankrolling Edwards' programme, was at least they didn't have to deal with the too.
The rights, wrongs and causes of these disputes aren't that important now - some are probably already forgotten - but there was little doubt as to what had to happen: a fresh start.
That came about in October when former Sport England chairman was invited to bring his no-nonsense businessman's brain to the task of organising an elite British set-up which could co-exist with robust national structures.
The was the result and within a few months the sport had a new constitution, a new performance director in the shape of the hugely experienced Kevin Hickey and a raft of new coaches.
All that remained to be settled was Edwards' future. Could a solution be found that would keep him on board, in a role that reflected BABA's more collegiate approach, whilst drawing a line under what went before?
. Efforts were made on both sides to patch something together but there was just too much scar tissue.
Which brings me back to Sunday and the opening of Team GB's fantastic new home, because while the search for green shoots goes on elsewhere they are there for all to see at the .
As moves go this wasn't that big in terms of distance: they have moved from one end of the corridor to another. But as an upgrade this is bungalow to mansion territory.
Whereas Edwards had to operate in a cramped gym shared with (among others), new head coach and his team have a place twice as big - filled with three Olympic-sized rings, three smaller rings with sprung floors, a dozen of the latest punch bags and every piece of training equipment imaginable - all to themselves.
And nobody will accuse the GB boxing team of not looking the part again. Whenever the squad and its support staff assemble they will look resplendent in red, white and blue.
But there is more to a great gym than equipment and kit. There needs to be something less tangible, a feeling that you are part of something bigger, something special.
To foster this Hickey and Mapp plan to cover the walls with photos of British Olympians and mementos of triumphs. There are already two pictures of up high on the wall to inspire those with golden dreams.
The sense of belonging to a tradition of excellence will be reinforced by an induction ceremony for every new squad member. Just as Australia and England cricketers know where they stand in the list of capped players, GB boxers will also be given a number that is theirs for keeps.
was at the launch and he was impressed to see how his agency's cash had been invested. Keen, of course, knows a thing or two about the impact new premises can have, at their new home in Manchester.
And it's not too far-fetched to say British boxing could be on the verge of cycling-style success.
With US amateur boxing in disarray, the main challenge in London will come from the east - China, Russia and the former Soviet republics - and that traditional powerhouse, Cuba.
But British results have been improving at every age-group level, and there can no more excuses about a lack of resources.
Medals mean money in the virtuous circle that is British Olympic sport and those Beijing prizes (which came on cost-per-medal basis second only to cycling) brought the sport for London.
And let's be honest about this, host nations do well in Olympic boxing competitions. There's nothing like a home crowd to help point out scoring punches to uncertain judges.
On the downside, however, is the fact the current squad is a little light on experience, which is hardly surprising given the post-Beijing exodus, and this will be hard work.
But time is on their side and any assessment of the new regime's progress should be reserved until the and 2011 Worlds.
Another variable is the recent change from four two-minute rounds to three three-minute rounds. It might not sound like a big change but one GB coach described this as the difference between a 200m sprint and an 800m middle-distance race. He also predicted there would be a lot more knockouts as power became more of a factor.
So that is why the final plank of the BABA package makes such good sense. After years of almost no contact with the pros, apart from the one-way transfer of talent, amateur boxing is talking to the professional game again.
A key part of this dialogue is the use of "consultant" coaches and the first two to sign up are Carl Froch's trainer and former world champion .
The involvement of coaches of this calibre is significant for lots of reasons - they will definitely help GB's amateurs improve their stamina and power - but perhaps the most significant contribution they can make is providing a link between the two factions of the sport.
A man like Woodhall, who won and would have stayed on for a crack at gold in 1992 if he had been as well looked after as today's amateurs, will be able to spell out the risks and benefits of turning pro far better than a coach who has knows nothing of the prize-fighting game.
It makes me wonder what would have been if he had known about the changes that were coming. He will be 26 when London 2012 comes about but he will never know quite how much an Olympic gold can put on your first pro contract.
What is certain, however, is that those following Gavin in the Olympic team will never again wonder if the grass is greener in Albania.
Comment number 1.
At 15th May 2009, LondonMadHead wrote:fvantastic article - GB boxing needed a pick me up and that is exactly what it got.
lets move on now and build for the future
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 16th May 2009, YouNeedToKnow wrote:Not to sure why this Terry Edwards guy get all the credit for the British success in the amateur boxing game, he was always just the person at the front taking the credit for what the core youth coaches have already developed.
Nobody just wakes up one day and goes to see Terry Edwards and becomes an international boxing performer on the world stage,,, just like that,,,,,
You never here the name of the coach Jim Division mentioned. This is the Coach that found a young Amir Karn and brought on board and turned into an international performer for Great British Boxing in a year when nobody of any substance had qualified for the Olympics from Team GB.
Anyway that said a done he is no long in the GB amateur game so onwards and upwards
And now we hear of professional coaches getting involved in an amateur game, the styles are too different what a waste of TEAM GB cash I wonder what the financial demands of these guys are on the pot of cash for developing the boxers.
Big names demanding big cash giving very little.
Please comment on this.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 17th May 2009, Matt Slater wrote:Hi YouNeedToKnow, you make a valid point about Terry Edwards' minimal involvement in the development of young talent - and it's a point that many within the ABAE structure have been making for some time. And you're also right that Edwards had a happy knack of being around when it came time for the media, which loved Edwards because he was approachable and quoteable, to apportion credit.
But I think you're underplaying his significant contribution to GB boxing. Let me explain why I believe this. One, he was a great figurehead for the team in the way he dealt with the media and all other distractions during major tournaments. He also fostered a sense of unity and specialness in the team whilst the nonsense I refer to above was raging between the ABAE, Welsh/Scots, UK Sport and him. He largely insulated his guys from all that. He was also the proverbial "good man to have in your corner"...his experience of international competition and refereeing made him a top cornerman. But most of all, he backed his fighters to the hilt, which is why the vast majority of them speak so highly of him.
As for your point about the pro consultants, I disagree. I don't know how much they're on but I do know they will put in more hours with the team than they're actually paid for...that's happening already. I agree that the amateur and pro games are very different (some pro trainers and promoters say they're almost different sports) but I think the gap between them is going to decrease slightly with the change to three three-min rounds. I also think Olympic sports should constantly be looking beyond their immediate surroundings for new ideas and training techniques. I'm reliably told that the equipment in the old Sheffield gym was very out of date and could have been the reason so many of the team had hand injuries. This wouldn't have been tolerated in a pro gym. But most importantly, I believe the consultant coaches will be able to give much better advice on when amateurs should turn pro...hopefully, they'll be able to persuade a few more to hold on a bit longer. That's certainly the impression I got from Woodhall.
Anyway, thanks for reading.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 28th May 2009, hackerjack wrote:Not to sure why this Terry Edwards guy get all the credit for the British success in the amateur boxing game, he was always just the person at the front taking the credit for what the core youth coaches have already developed.
-------------
Sorry but no. Youth coaches are important of course, they lay down the fundamentals and it is their coaching that allows the rest to know whether the kids are any good or not, however it is the elite coach that makes the difference between olympic gold and also ran in most cases.
Just as with any sport it is fairly easy to spot pure talent and to bring it up to a good level through coaching, it is far more difficult to take that and add the 10% more needed to achieve full potential. I say this as a grass roots coach myself, albeit in a very different sport.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 28th May 2009, hackerjack wrote:And now we hear of professional coaches getting involved in an amateur game, the styles are too different what a waste of TEAM GB cash
----------
Again no. The pro coaches will be working on specific things such as conditioning and strength work, tactical approaches will still be dictated by the BABA guys.
Also it is not just about the coaching. Exposure to more people from the pro game for me would actually help amateurs make the decision to stay as amateurs for longer. At the moment there is a big wall you have to jump over to become a pro, you can not really see over it to know what it will be like and deciding whether you are cut out for it or not so it is a decision based purely on gut. Similarly there is no way back once it is crossed so you are forced to leap with no regress. Amateur boxing coaches will rarely if ever help anyone with training for the pro ranks, something else which forces people to jump before they are ready.
So exposing them to Pro coaches can have two effects: First they will be better advised as to whether they are capable and ready to enter the pro ranks or not by people who actually know and do not have a vested interest in turning them pro. Second they can actually start to train as pros before making the switch, building themselves up if they are not yet ready while still enabling them to compete as amateurs.
This approach is by far the best solutions for both sides of the sport as it will hopefully provide a better and longer lasting set of amateurs who then have a more solid and complete base for turning pro should they wish to do so.
The only reason not to embrace it si the same petty squabbling that has held both codes back in this country for decades as they seem to think they are in competition with one anothr,
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)