³ÉÈËÂÛ̳

This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

The EU Treaty (treat 4 who)
the judge on the case? (what kind of case)expressed surprise, surprise at what?
I cant see him surprising me. bread butter what side comes to mind

I got it Auntie, Mad bob isnt mad I am/or has the other other bbc got 2 u?

So Auntie/whitepersonage its the coughing you cant fondle/handle

The going back, is/can be a usefull tool dont you think Auntie beeb.

On Zimbabwe shouldn't it be the SADC that calls it off? Then the pressure from the AU could convert to a UN intervention?

Can't remember his name but wasn't that KGB Colonel, he's been on the telly a few times, Oleg Kalugin thought to be the Russian end? I am sure you would know and I am very hazy about it.

Good on the ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ for keeping up coverage on the depressing situation in Zimbabwe. Just a single detachment of troops on the way to Iaq or Kabul could be divered to do a necessary job in Harare, and take out that mad dictator and his cronies. Zimbabweans deserve our support and need us to intervene now.

#6 The second para was of course meant to be identified to the Markov story.

For Monday:

The leader of the Labour Party in Scotland again calls on the SNP to hold a referendum on Scottish independence.

Are they prepared for division if it happens? I don't think there will be a change in the timetable but is this a reason for having the debate.

The government, media and the countries are sleepwalking towards a disaster - not whether Scotland stays or goes.

For example if the issues are not thought through well in advance will one of your other stories

"Scotland would be in budget surplus of more than £800m with a "geographical share" of North Sea revenues, figures suggest."

could become a blight on a new relationship. I don't see us handing over any oil or gas by the way.

Is the government machinery so easy to disentangle that you leave it till the last minute? T5. Lisbon. 16000 Poles will arrive from Europe - and I like the Poles by the way.

You people must dread seeing this ID.

OK, I think anybody that knows about my views and alleged experiences would class me as a Grade A nutter. I don't agree of course.

Therefore you may say people who live in glass houses should not throw stones.

But it seems to me that there is a real problem on this site with far right racist activists peddling their arguments in sheep's clothing.

I get my posts pulled pretty regularly often for unfathomable reasons. If I get excited and go over the top then the censorship is fine. I am starting to suspect though that there are malicious complaints so that people can dominate the agenda.

Censorship goes against the debate issue. I don't like to use the complain button because often its not the specific post - its the impact of a series of posts that must affect the number of people, and their background, who would take part on your site.

Therefore it is your problem not mine.

Maybe I am being overly protective and people out there are quite able to handle this strategy and recognise the propaganda for what it is.

You are probably well aware of this and maybe don't view it as serious.

There doesn't seem to be an obvious solution.

I was contemplating putting in posts that mention Searchlight the anti-fascist magazine each time I see certain individuals at work - without mentioning the individuals. I am too poor to subscribe these days (best to MI5) but assume it is still going.

I assume that that won't qualify as an advertisement and get pulled?