A change of leadership, and image, for UKIP
The election of Lord Pearson of Rannoch as the new leader of UKIP may radically change public perceptions of the party.
Lord Pearson's predecessor Nigel Farage has the appearance of the salesman ready to offer you a couple of cut-price bargains from inside his cashmere overcoat, the cheeky chappie who relished getting up the noses of the political establishment.
Lord Pearson, in contrast, must be the most upper crust figure elected to the leadership of a political party since Lord Home in 1963, much more upper class in appearance and style than David Cameron.
Lord Pearson, like Mr Cameron, went to Eton. And just like Mr Cameron at the time of his election to his party's leadership, Lord Pearson is a member of the White's, the old-fashioned gentlemen's club which still excludes women from its premises (Mr Cameron has since resigned from White's, no doubt because its stuffy image badly conflicted with his efforts to modernise the Conservative Party).
In voice and appearance Lord Pearson takes us back to a Britain of the mid-20th Century when politicians were expected to be articulate performers on TV.
And remarkably Lord Pearson is 22 years older than Mr Farage. When was the last time a party elected a leader who was that much older than his predecessor?
It will be interesting to see how Lord Pearson goes down with existing UKIP voters, and whether he encourages more defections from more traditional Conservatives of the older generation.
Comment number 1.
At 27th Nov 2009, stevie wrote:prefer Nigel, this latest guy looks seedy
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 27th Nov 2009, Jonathan wrote:Charles Kennedy to Menzies Campbell was not far off.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 28th Nov 2009, DebtJuggler wrote:Well at least he's a little to the right of Nick Griffin!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 28th Nov 2009, CG wrote:UKRIP 1993 - 28/11/09.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 28th Nov 2009, Metrodeco wrote:UKIP are not as bad as the BNP. I had an encounter with the far right recently in my tea shop, as I explain here:
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 29th Nov 2009, stanilic wrote:At least the UKIP leadership now reflects its membership: a bunch of sad old buffers living in the past: one man, one blazer! They do however represent a significant proportion of the population.
Farage is standing for Parliament in the consitutency in which I am an elector. Despite my complete disagreement with him on every possible policy he at least has not filled his boots at my expense whilst telling me it was all within the rules. He has got my vote.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)
Comment number 7.
At 30th Nov 2009, CG wrote:#6, of Farage has not filled his boots at the taxpayer's expense, then he is about the only one of his party that hasn't, some of them illegally so and now doing time for it.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 7)
Comment number 8.
At 30th Nov 2009, stanilic wrote:By my calculation Farage is playing a much longer game than filling his boots at the public expense would justify.
It is a great pity that many in the established political class sought to fill their boots at the taxpayers' expense as I don't think any such are worth even one electoral vote. I hope that none of the greedy ones get re-elected next time.
I am also hoping to see quite a few from all parties spending their time in Her Majesty's more depressing emporia. Examples must be made!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 8)