I'm intrigued by a caption in the Blair book, , for the famous ice-cream photo.
It reads: "ice creams with Gordon on the campaign trail, 2 May 2005. I insisted on getting a flake."
It is an odd thing to say. Is it a dig at GB? Or am I reading too much into it?
Jump to more content from this blog
I'm Michael Crick, and I'm Newsnight's political editor. My guiding rule is that in any story there's usually something the politicians would prefer the world not to know. My job is to find that out. Follow me on
For the latest updates across ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ blogs,
visit the Blogs homepage.
You can stay up to date with Newsnight: Michael Crick via these feeds.
Newsnight: Michael Crick Feed(RSS)
Newsnight: Michael Crick Feed(ATOM)
If you aren't sure what RSS is you'll find useful.
³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ © 2014 The ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.
This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.
Comment number 1.
At 3rd Sep 2010, Chris McCray wrote:It's Blair being frivolous with money - Gordon's budget didn't stretch to a flake!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 3rd Sep 2010, NeilSimon wrote:But didn't Tony Blair state that he/they hadn't bought or hadn't wanted to buy ice creams WITH flakes as this present an adverse image of wealth on their Labour party promotions? This I heard on the Blair interview with @richardpbacon yesterday on ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ Radio 5Live. Maybe Tony had a lapse of memory? You may want to check the radio interview.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 3rd Sep 2010, Red Rag wrote:What are you doing in the background smiling like a cheshire cat with a Labour rosette on??
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 3rd Sep 2010, barriesingleton wrote:AND ON THE SUBJECT OF SMILES - NEITHER IS GENUINE (#3)
I remember that incident - it was Blair winding up Brown. THERE WAS NOT AN IOTA OF EYE CONTACT IN THE WHOLE EXCHANGE.
How appalling that two such disastrous personalities should each be Prime Minister of this country. How utterly predictable that, under the Westminster Ethos, such is inevitable. How galling that WE HAVE GOT OURSELVES ANOTHER ONE.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 3rd Sep 2010, DebtJuggler wrote:I bet they just wanted to squidge them in each others faces.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 3rd Sep 2010, MaxWax wrote:I think you have something here.
Its possibly a visualisation of neo-classical existential relativism focusing on the canonical view of the symbolistic flake and the metaphysical contextualisation of melting ice cream. However, Blair may just have wanted chocolate.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)
Comment number 7.
At 4th Sep 2010, Allison Ogden-Newton wrote:Michael, sometimes a flake is just a flake.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 7)
Comment number 8.
At 5th Sep 2010, stevie wrote:history will judge.....that they were both ...flakey
Complain about this comment (Comment number 8)
Comment number 9.
At 6th Sep 2010, Tom wrote:Red Rag @ 3 - while it does look a bit like Mr Crick, I'm pretty certain that's former MP for Gillingham Paul Clark.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 9)
Comment number 10.
At 8th Sep 2010, Isatou wrote:Pass the sick bag !
Complain about this comment (Comment number 10)