Portadown churches will go it alone at Christmas
The two Presbyterian churches in Portadown who became embroiled in a Christmas Day standoff over gender have come to a resolution. First Portadown and Armagh Road congregations made news headlines last January when the Reverend Stafford Carson of First Portadown explained to his Armagh Road colleague, the Reverend Christina Bradley, that his church could not allow a woman minister into his pulpit. After a number of private meetings between the two ministers since January, Christina Bradley has announced to her congregation that the 60-year tradition of a joint service is now to be discontinued. Henceforth, the two churches will run separate Christmas Day services.
Nevertheless, I understand that both ministers have met each month since the row broke in January and have enjoyed very positive and friendly meetings during which they have deepened their understanding of each other's ministries and perspectives. One could read the close of the annual joint service as a failure to reconcile; but there is another story here that is easily missed in media reporting: of two congregations, two ministers, and two quite contrasting worldviews now in conversation and now on a journey of understanding.
We'll have a fuller update on the Portadown developments on tomorrow's Sunday Sequence.
A Statement from the Rev Christina Bradley and Rev Stafford Carson
Since the painful experience of last Christmas we have established an amicable and good working relationship. Together with our Kirk Sessions we are respectful of each others views and are planning some joint congregational activities in the near future. Like most congregations we have agreed, for now, to hold our own Christmas Day services and are eager to concentrate on the important areas of mission in Portadown.
Comment number 1.
At 7th Jun 2008, John Wright wrote:It's so, so pathetic.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 7th Jun 2008, petermorrow wrote:Hi John
Pathetic? I'm not so sure.
Here's what we've had:
A disagreement. (what would life be without them?)
A very public difference of opinion.
Regular 'positive and friendly' meetings by those in dispute.
'Deepened understanding'
Sessions 'respectful of each others views'.
A joint statement.
Planned meetings of the congregations.
All that sounds like an attempt to solve a problem, at least it does to me.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 9th Jun 2008, Peter wrote:One of my wife's friends is an elder at Carnmoney Presbyterian, Stafford Carson's previous congregation. I quized him on the situation at Portadown and it would seem that all is not as it appears. Do not judge Rev. Stafford Carson too harshly.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 9th Jun 2008, John Wright wrote:Peter Morrow- The very idea that a minister would not accept another in his pulpit because of her gender is pathetic. I've met Carson a couple of times; I'm sure he's a nice guy (even if the holder of utterly moronic views). This 'resolution' is a resolution to a disagreement that should never have taken place at all. I once attended a church in which the committee took a whole night to decide on the colour of the toilet roll holders. That they came to a resolution was good, I guess; that they had it in the first place was pathetic.
Peter Henderson- I think you should explain why Carson shouldn't be judged harshly over this; so far you've only said rather cryptically that it's "not what it appears". What does that mean?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 9th Jun 2008, Peter wrote:Peter Henderson- I think you should explain why Carson shouldn't be judged harshly over this; so far you've only said rather cryptically that it's "not what it appears". What does that mean?
John: At first I had the same feelings as yourself over the matter (i.e. the whole affair was petty and pathetic).
However, I have heard Rev. Carson preach on a number of occasions and he certainly doesn't come over as having extreme views.
I'm really only going on here-say on this but if you think of the structure of the Presbyterian church in Ireland and some of the people who have the power in a congregation (i.e.members of the Kirk session, clerk of session etc.) you'll be along the right lines on what I've been told. It's not just the minister who has the power to make decisions in the Presbyterian church.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 9th Jun 2008, petermorrow wrote:Hi John
"The very idea that a minister would not accept another in his pulpit because of her gender is pathetic....a disagreement that should never have taken place at all."
Indeed, some people feel that way, but others don't. Therefore we *have* a disagreement. Simply saying we shouldn't have one isn't going to stop one.
So, what do we do in the case of a disagreement?
Shout pathetic at one another, or try to reach understanding?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)
Comment number 7.
At 9th Jun 2008, John Wright wrote:Peter Henderson- I see what you're saying; it's the Session rather than the minister with the major issues. Why Carson wouldn't just say that and ask the Clerk of Session to explain their asininity is another matter of what is wrong with the church.
Peter Morrow- I'm merely saying it's pathetic, which is one opinion on the matter. I couldn't care less whether they resolve it or not; the more this archaic form of religion self-destructs due to such farcicality, the better for the church in general. But calling it what it is brings a level of brutal honesty to the church that it is sorely lacking. As a former presby I'm pleased to give them the gift of candour.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 7)
Comment number 8.
At 9th Jun 2008, petermorrow wrote:Hi John
I actually do care whether or not it is sorted out.
You are also going to have to decide whether 'pathetic' is 'one opinion on the matter' or a statement of 'what it is'.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 8)
Comment number 9.
At 12th Jun 2008, davidjagnew wrote:The whole matter would not have arisen at all if Christians realised that the incarnation is to be celebrated everyday rather than one made up day a year.
David
Complain about this comment (Comment number 9)
Comment number 10.
At 3rd Aug 2008, anti_apostate wrote:I agree with the stand the Rev Stafford Carson took on banning this feminist apostate who is an ecumenist and rejects the authoritative word of the living God, from entering his church pulpit. Why on earth would any minister who is called of God, and who believes Gods infallible book have fellowship with liberal apostates who do not believe the Bible and who have their religiosity but who are not born again of the Spirit of God? From such withdraw thyself! Have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather "reprove" them. I hope Stafford does not bow to the pressure from the spiritual darkness from within the apostate Irish Presbyterian Church!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 10)