³ÉÈËÂÛ̳

A couple years ago, I went on a holiday to Paris and Berlin. I had expected the accessibility of both countries to range from average to good and, for the most part, I was correct. Paris was the worst of the two; major attractions were accessible but most stores and restaurants were off-limits. My traveling companions thought it was great that I could get into the Louvre and the Musée d'Orsay for free, but I find such gestures well-intentioned but ultimately meaningless. I'd much rather pay for my ticket and be able to use the Metro. Free admission seems like another way of saying, "Sorry our city is so inhospitable. Here's a free pass for your troubles." Don't get me wrong, I loved Paris and would go back in an instant. But I had the impression that it's a city where people with disabilities are largely hidden from view.

Berlin was much more accessible, which isn't surprising considering that most of the city was rebuilt from rubble after World War II. Even the U-bahn and S-bahn were usable (although the gaps between platform and train were a bit uneven most of the time). And the little hotel where I stayed was more accessible than anything I've encountered in the States, which was a pleasant and unexpected surprise. Berlin seems like a city where things get done-as opposed to the more languid vibe of Paris--and I have no doubt that it will be even more accessible the next time I visit.

Assuming I ever replenish my travel fund, I hope to see other parts of Europe. Of course, London is on my list. And I'd like to see something of Amsterdam besides the airport. Maybe somewhere in Spain or Italy. What would you suggest?

And if you're interested in seeing pictures from my trip, you can find them .

• Visit