³ÉÈËÂÛ̳

Red Square

Comments

1. At 03:35 PM on 13 Apr 2007, witchiwoman wrote:

   That is truly beautiful - can't wait to hear how that wil be described!

2. At 03:36 PM on 13 Apr 2007, Scottie McClue wrote:

   Eddie...

   That's Red Suare Barnsley, in which Captain Kirk is seen, briefly, before a silhouetted pithead and Mr. Spock looks quizzical beside a line of police vans. Noice!
   

3. At 03:41 PM on 13 Apr 2007, admin annie wrote:

   well it knocks a glass box into an kicked hat.

   That seems a strangely tortuous expression now that I've typed it. Have I got it right?

4. At 03:52 PM on 13 Apr 2007, nikki noodle wrote:

   A cut and paste from that website:

   
   At the center, mass is funneled onto the embryonic star, while "eddies" and 'clumps' circling further out in the disk are the seeds which will grow into planets, moons and asteroids.

   
   how'ds that feel?! And who's clumps?!!

   n-n
   xx
   

5. At 04:11 PM on 13 Apr 2007, John H. wrote:

   I just ended up in September again...

   Anybody remember the email address?

6. At 04:24 PM on 13 Apr 2007, RJD wrote:

   John H -

   ohlookseptemberagain@hotmail.com

   Spooky that! One minute I was reading about temperature C vs F on the previous thread and then I was back on the "Weather" thread in September - took me a minute to cotton on!

   I've emailed 'em

7. At 04:27 PM on 13 Apr 2007, witchiwoman wrote:

   AA -
   I thought it was cocked, though kicked would possibly have the same effect.

8. At 04:30 PM on 13 Apr 2007, RJD wrote:

   admin annie - Hahahaha . It's "knocked into a cocked hat" but your version is much,much better!

9. At 04:33 PM on 13 Apr 2007, Gillian wrote:

   It is a beautiful image, but speaking as a techno-phobe, I wonder how ''true'' the image is, and how much the true image has been distorted by the very technology used to capture it. Is this an imponderable question?

10. At 04:43 PM on 13 Apr 2007, John H. wrote:

    Ta RJD. Seeing the hotmail account does make me wonder if it's a joke though!

11. At 05:41 PM on 13 Apr 2007, ƒräñ瀧 Ø wrote:

    It's lovely! And as a technoneophyte, I don't mind if it's been digitally enhanced, photoshopped or just plain tweaked. Though John H's question is relevant, of course.

    RJD (8), I agree, AAnnie's version is great. But watch your words or you'll get EdI all excited again (see yesterday's posts about farmyard fowl)

12. At 05:57 PM on 13 Apr 2007, ƒräñ瀧 Ø wrote:

    Go, catch a dying star...

13. At 06:08 PM on 13 Apr 2007, wrote:

    ƒräñ瀧 Ø (12),

    I got modded off a discussion on the 'today' discussions for saying 'cock pheasant'. You couldn't make it up!

    xx
    ed

    (He came for peanuts out of my hand today) - work on that RJD & Appy! ;-)

14. At 06:12 PM on 13 Apr 2007, Rachel wrote:

    Just lovely. I know it sounds obvious, but isn't the internet a brilliant thing. Just a few years ago, an item like that would probably have been thought a bit pointless on radio - but now we can all (well, the 75% of us with broadband, anyway) go and see the image for ourselves.

15. At 09:24 PM on 13 Apr 2007, admin annie wrote:

    
    WW - you are right, thanks. It was one of those moments when you know you've got it wrong, but can't bring to mind what the right version is.

    Although looking at it now, I quite like it.

    I too was just Septembered and have e-mailed the appropriate address.

16. At 11:30 PM on 13 Apr 2007, Aperitif wrote:

    Oh yes, very pretty.

17. At 12:13 AM on 14 Apr 2007, ƒräñ瀧 Ø wrote:

    peacedove , Ed I. Tried to cut & paste the graphic/icon from the Today programme board, but it didn't work.

    How silly and over-sensitive some people can be over harmless things.

    It's called the countryside, sillies! And I speak as a townie who comes from centuries of farming folk on both sides of the family.

    Rachel, I agree. Whoopee for multimedia, at this level, anyway.

18. At 11:14 AM on 14 Apr 2007, Rachel wrote:

    Can anyone tell me what the thing is about September? I tried to show SO the lovely Red Square on his Blackberry in bed last night (sad life we lead, I know) and we were back in Spetember too. Am I mad, in a coma ...

19. At 02:55 PM on 14 Apr 2007, Izzy T'Me wrote:

    Rachel (18), no, you're not mad or in a coma (in this respect, anyway ;o)) as far as I can make out we do this zingy back in time thing periodically. Marc (the New Blog Prince) is trying to work out why but hasn't got there yet. He has asked for e-mails when it does and the hotmail address is on the right.

20. At 06:54 PM on 14 Apr 2007, Gillian wrote:

    Frances O (17) Do I detect a fellow family-historian frogger by any chance?! My lot were all agricultural labourers generations ago. Changed to factory labourers when they moved into towns during the Industrial Revolution. I still consider myself a country girl at heart! ;o)

21. At 10:48 AM on 15 Apr 2007, wrote:

    Val P (21),

    Our stupid yap-yap machines (Jack Russels) aren't able to take the pheasants on, and the pheasants seem to know it. They respect each other by keeping a couple of watchful meters apart. We also have .

    I wouldn't keep pets at all if it was up to me. I prefer wildlife to livestock. So much so that I distribute a half tonne of food every year.

    xx
    ed

22. At 10:26 PM on 15 Apr 2007, Val P wrote:

    Now Ed I, that's fascinating, so you must have seen one of my posts (re feeding pheasants at the back door) or you wouldn't be replying to it would you? So did it appear, then get modded off? Why am I bothering to grow paranoid?

    Partly because we are, bizarrely enough, also having a problem with our Royal Mail deliveries. 4 items (that we specifically know about) have not arrived, over the last 3 weeks. Customer Services (grrrr) say that doesn't consitute an abnormal occurrence! I pointed out to them that as far as we can remember, during 25 years of living here we haven't had this problem at all, and so 4 items going walkabout in 3 weeks, is way beyond the realms of coincidence!!!

23. At 01:05 PM on 16 Apr 2007, wrote:

    Where oh Where did Val P's number 21 go?
    ;-)
    ed