Big in Barcelona
- 13 Feb 08, 20:45 GMT
Looking back on the teeming madness that is the mobile phone industry's annual shindig, there was no one headline-grabbing story, but plenty of pointers to the road ahead. I've picked five things that were big in Barcelona.
Touchscreen
Apple's touchscreen iPhone certainly started something. Sony Ericsson, LG and Samsung were among the companies launching new touch-screen handsets. But not everyone is convinced that consumers want touch on its own – LG, for instance, has included a slide-out keyboard with its music phone. Texters still struggle with touch, but as Apple refines its software, expect plenty more imitations in the coming months.
Faster Networks
Talking to network people can give you a headache as the blizzard of acronyms – WiMax, LTE, UWB – fall thick and fast. But one thing's clear - if you have a need for speed you can expect your mobile connection to get a lot faster in the coming year. The battle is on between WiMax and LTE (Long Term Evolution) to show where mobile networks go after 3g – and in Barcelona LTE seemed to be winning more hearts and minds amongst operators than WiMax, even though it is a little further away. Korea's LG was promising downloads of up to 60 Mbps with its LTE technology – as someone who only gets 2 Mbps on his home broadband connection, that's a mouth-watering prospect. Mind you, promised speeds often don't materialise.
Femtocells
The mobile operators will be keen to see some of the work of these new networks handed over to customers in their homes by the Femtocell. This small mobile phone personal base station (some people in the industry were not amused when I described it in a previous post as a mobile phone mast in your front room) will undergo more trials in the coming months. The networks are very excited by a technology which could give customers such a fast, cheap, mobile connection at home that they give up their fixed-line phones. But they need customers to share that excitement.
Mobile Payments
This is an idea that has been around for a decade without really taking off – I remember going to Helsinki in 1999 and filming a vending machine that would sell me a Coke if I sent it a text message. But now it does seem to be happening, not in Europe or the United States, but in Kenya and Afghanistan. Last year Vodafone chose Kenya to launch its M-Pesa service which allows users to transfer money by mobile. One use is amongst migrant workers who can send money across the country without getting on a bus. 1.6 million people have signed up in Kenya, and now a similar service is to be launched in Afghanistan. There it will be used mainly by microfinance organisations to deliver loan instalments. There are even plans for voice recognition software to give wider access to the service in a country with high illiteracy rates.
Android
Google's new open operating system for mobiles was supposed to be the biggest thing in Barcelona this week. Yes, there was plenty of talk about Android– and even a few prototype handsets – but there was less buzz about it than you might think. There were plenty of new Symbian phones to look at and Sony Ericsson's first Windows Mobile handset, the Xperian 1, was rated by many as the best in show. Suddenly talk that existing operating systems would be swept aside by Google's arrival seemed overdone. Still, this next time next year there will be plenty of Android phones available, the smartphone market will have expanded dramatically, and the battle of the operating systems can begin in earnest.
By the way, the video features Bill Gadja of the GSM association (they organise the show) giving his assessment of the stories of the week. You may notice that it looks a lot more polished than the other videos on this blog – that's because it was filmed by a professional cameraman on a professional camera!
This post is closed to new comments.
The ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ is not responsible for the content of external internet sites
Comments
I am looking forward to the Android phones. I am a google boy through and through, so I may wait before upgrading this year.
Guy
Its funny, alot of people especially us Brits slate the iPhone for all the wrong reasons. Even though the entire industry desperately tries to mimic its flawless touch screen interface.
I really can't see Sony or LG matching the iPhone in terms ui or build quality.
Posted from my iPhone
Nokia N96? iPhone basher... no mention.
The sound on the video is only good when the interviewer is talking or about to talk.
The Nokia N95 blows the iPhone out of the water in terms of features such as a brilliant camera, 3G, GPRS etc. all features that are not present in the iPhone.
The iPhone is however does boast the best touch screen on the market and brilliant interface design. I feel it is more for a US market where wireless access is free and widely available.
If apple actual update the iPhone I think that it could be a market leader one day!
I am really looking forward to the new Sony Ericsson phones. The X1 looks particularly good. Interesting they have gone for WM rather than Symbian.
The iPhone interface is fantastic and it does look great, its just the rest of the phone that is dreadful. Everything else on the phone is 3 year old technology. It is just a portable portal for Apple to sell you stuff and users pay for that privilege. I am happy for them to do that but I will not buy into that. I do hope the new X1 is not geared that way.
"Apple's touchscreen iPhone certainly started something. Sony Ericsson, LG and Samsung were among the companies launching new touch-screen handsets."
Gosh, Sony Ericsson were slow off the mark, it must only be 5 years since I bought one of their phones that did 2/3 of what the "revolutionary" iPhone does (and some things it doesn't)!.
Once more Apple get undeserved credit for innovation, when what they should get is deserved credit for excellent implementation and marketing new technologies to the less tech savvy.
Faster networks and mobile payments are just the same old tired guff the industry churns out every year. The N96 looks nice, but is DVB-H going to be big here? The Virgin Lobster didn't give that impression. The XPERIA X1 seems like a niche product really. I think SE's mid-range G-series phones were more relevant because if anything we are seeing a gradual creep of usable smartphone functionality onto an everyman mobile. Android is only in the early stages but has the corporate weight behind it that may enable another Apple-style challenge to the existing operator/manufacturer/software vendor business model but this time in a way that benefits the customer with a decent product at a low, low price.
I switched to the N95 8GB recently and was so disappointed with the clunky interface and the regular crashes, I sent it back. If I could have justified the cost I would have bought the iPhone. The UI is slick and the OS stable.
We should all watch out for Google, their business model for android is based on advertising as I understand it. Its bad enough having to be careful what you click on to avoid expensive data costs nevermind being bombarded with ads aswell.
I have the HTC kaiser/v1615/mdaIII (there are a lot of names for just one thing) it has all the features you could possably want alhtough a few have been deliberately reduced such as voip or skype only working over the speaker phone, i wander whos idea that was???.
how has "the iphone clearly started something" when the other manufacturers have been making touchscreen devices long before apple came along.
Now if you'd have said they're copying the UI...
To Tom Warwick: yes the iPhone has a fantastic UI (although I wouldn't quite go as far as "flawless"), but is it any good as a *phone*? Try getting O2 to admit what proportion of their dropped-call complaints come from iPhone users, especially following the recent firmware update.
Personally, I'd rather my phone was a phone first and a multimedia platform second, not vice-versa.
I was working on mobile payments back in 1999 in the UK and we developed the idea from the text message to building a coke machine that could sell you a can using Bluetooth. We demonstrated the principle at Telecom 99 in Geneva in 1999 and the Japanese liked it so much the machine was shipped to Japan for demonstration at Comm 99 in Tokyo. Sadly nothing more ever seemed to come of it. Two of us had a brainstorming session to come up with different ways of using your mobile to pay for goods, most of the ideas were dismissed as unworkable. Every now and then I see one of our ideas resurface and have the pleasure of thinking that I thought of that in 1999.
Interesting that everyone attributes the touch-screen to Apple and the iPhone, when the Palm Treo series has had a touchscreen for the past 4 years (and is actually more functional than the iPhone because the OS is not locked up). Amazing what a bit of marketing can do!
Really looking forward to the full power of the google phone unleashed in the near future.I believe it'll live up to expectation.
The payment by text messaging is a fantastic idea that has been implemented, not really sure why it hasnt picked up on a grand scale in places like the US and UK.
It's really funny how some go on about how touch screen technology was not innovated by apple and all. Lets face it, the manner in which it's been used to present the UI of a phone is revolutionary and the overall build of the phone is unmatched. Yea, u could say that certain phone makes came out with some functionalities first but look at the rate and ease of update of iphone firmware and the hair raising brilliance in general.Apple rules!!!!
In reply to post number 9. Sure, Google's revenue is based on advertising, but it will be based upon the applications you use, such as company advertising when you are looking for nearby items and locations with your phone using the built in GPS over a 3G connection. I could even install apps on it, and develop my own if I have the wherewithal, at zero cost as the operating system and devlopement kits cost nothing.
I'd rather reduce costs to all, and get a free phone and a cheaper contract, and accept some advertising, than have to pay a minimum of £900 for an 18 month contract and not be able to use my internet connection anywhere at a reasonable speed, and install the apps I want to use.
It's funny how quick people are to slate the iphone for the wrong technologies, past technologies, or whatever. People claim it's not for tech savvy people. I'm a student at Newcastle university in the school of electrical and electronic engineering doing a masters course.
The iPhone is for more than the not tech savvy user. It has fantastic design, brilliant UI and reduced clutter missing out the features that are not commonly used. To me, this is what great design is all about.
I have the HTC kaiser/v1615/mdaIII as well and I am SO surprised these phones are not talked about more. As the previous poster said there just isn't anything this phone doesn't have (well maybe a flash, but I don't miss it much). The phone supports HSDPA which gives you 1.8 Mbps downloads now - I'lve seen it myself in Central London. And you can bypass the Skype issue by using your headphone.
I am sure there are many phones that do what iphone does but better, but the point is we are all comparing them to the iphone! Its Apples fantastic marketing and targeting that has us all talking about it. I'm just waiting to get out of my existing mobile contract so I can sign up to o2 and join the world of iphone. I have herd a rumour that Apple is bringing out a second generation 'iphone2' this year which will sort out a lot of the problems people have been having... does anyone have more information on this?
Well Ive had a Nokia N95 and an HTC touch and the iPhone certainly beats those.
Sure touch has been around for a few years I had it on my iPaq many moons ago. What the iPhone does is innovation. The iphone gives us multi touch which is new. It gives us a UI that even my granny can use at 84. It provides a platform that is stable, secure and fast.
If your complaint is that it only has a 2mp camera then go and do what normal people do and buy a digital camera. A mobile is a mobile first, it is not and never will be a substitute for a digital camera, mp3 player or laptop.
Im so impressed with the Iphone that I would pay £500 for it if thats what it cost. If your not a corporate user it is quite simply the best device on the market.
The telecom equipment suppliers seem to be pushing the operators in to new speeds when GSM with Edge/GPRS seems to full fill most peoples needs i.e. internet. I see a future when most phones will be wifi/wimax enabled and people will be able to roam for free on municipal networks for free which are in the USA now. The operators will have to take on these cities with some very exciting and cheap ideas?
The mobile operators may complain that you described Femtocell in your article as 'a mobile phone base station in your home'.
But, that is exactly what it is.
NO THANKS. I DO NOT WANT ONE.
I really think that some stuff on the phones are mostly useless. Touch screens and all that comes along is just wast of money. You can have alll good stuff working well on a cheaper phone that would do the same. Anyway. Companies want to sell but I'm not buying last technology. Is just wating money for nothing
What impressed me was the software that a company called Synchronica had.The software they had enabled emails to be picked up even from the cheapo phone like mine. This will enable me to pick emails without a PC. Also they had a backup system for retrieving contacts and data that might take ages to recover in the event of a phone being lost.
Interesting stuff they had
hmmm, I think the Iphone is typically aimed at apple users who want the sleek finish, however the interface is very frustrating. Once you get past the initial buzz of a touch screen interface you realise how much you relied on buttons, and how simple yet effective they are.
Sure the Iphone can do X, Y and Z, but a 'phone' is currently used for making calls , texting, and taking pictures/videos, all of which dont require a touch screen.
I have found the LG prada and the iphone great to look at, but terribly unusable. on a hot day sweaty fingertips can make the phone look terrible and respond slugishly.
I reckon buttons will be the next big thing- or something along those lines...
"Gosh, Sony Ericsson were slow off the mark, it must only be 5 years since I bought one of their phones that did 2/3 of what the "revolutionary" iPhone does (and some things it doesn't)!."
- How was its multitouch?
I am always astonished by the anti-Apple, anti-iPhone comments any praise for them gets. You get the feeling they would say exactly the same thing WHATEVER Apple brought out.
Why not recognise -what even the experts say- that iPhone is revolutionary, and it does something no other mobile device ever has before.
The trouble that's in store for competitors is that Apple is an ecosystem, and works on many levels. Just designing a piece of hardware, a network, a piece of software is not enough to create the overall great experience that Apple is delivering today.
Mobile payments haven't really taken off, except in Kenya?! Try coming to Japan, where you can pay for just about everything with them these days, just by beeping your phone onto a scanner (which always seems to me like a hugely irresponsible idea for Europe, what with the silly amount of mobile phone theft that goes on).
What impressed me was the software that a company called Synchronica had.The software they had enabled emails to be picked up even from the cheapo phone like mine. This will enable me to pick emails without a PC. Also they had a backup system for retrieving contacts and data that might take ages to recover in the event of a phone being lost.
Interesting stuff they had
yes you analyze nicely but one thing that is really important that with the innovation of iphone user want touchscreen mobile and companies focus on this time is on touch screen mobiles....
In Edinburgh, you can pay parking meters by phone. You even get a text message five minutes before your time is up. I think this is available in other cities too. So that's one very small niche where mobile payments have worked.
I think the added value of the time warning helps to make it more attractive, as well as not needing the correct change. Whereas if you don't have the right change for a coke machine, the machine will give you change, or you can just go to a newsagent - so the mobile payment isn't really useful.
Rory, like you, I was at the Congress. Like you say, there didn't seem to be a big "wow factor" of innovation there. However, the biggest story, in my view, was the scale, professionalism and visibility of the Chinese vendors of network infrastructure - esp Huawei and ZTE - as well as the number of Chinese and Korean specialist technology companies on diplay. It means it's probably not a great time to be an Alcatel-Lucent, a Nortel, a Motorola, a Nokia-Siemens, or an Ericsson. Boring as it sounds, the big theme of Barca2008 was probably: mobile operators will be able to buy their network expansions and upgrades cheaper than they thought (now, if only they could put together attractive and easy-to-use propositions to get users to actually use those networks)
"Apple's touchscreen iPhone certainly started something" - no, actually this is YET ANOTHER journalist that simply copies the hype because they cannot be bothered to do some homework.
Have a look at what HTC has been offering for many years and give us reporting that doesn't make it seem like you're on Apple's payroll!
I own a palm T|X for 3 years, using touchscreen WiFi mp3 video and more and never crashed, it's a perfect easy to use tool this is the real thing! if an camera was added it was absulute perfect. Learn from this Palm T|X how to design a mobile pc!!!
Ihave the htc tytn 2. I am sorry for those that went to the trouble to get the iphone, as the only good thing on it is the multitouch, the rest is useless, no built in gps, no hsdpa, no word compiler.Fair enough if you dont need some of these features but for the price the htc just blows it out of the water plus you get far better features. But each one to himself.
The iPhone is a very nice idea, and it helps point the way for the future of mobile technologies. But it's a shame there wasn't more focus on it being a mobile phone above all else, as that's ultimately what everyone wants. For example, consumers in the future will be far more likely to buy a mobile phone with an integrated camera than a camera with mobile capabilities, even if they do exactly the same thing. The mobile phone is, and will continue to be, the best way of integrating multiple technologies into one device, so it is only natural that any such device will be primarily judged upon how good a phone it is. I feel that Apple, for all the success of the iPhone, have missed a trick here.
@Jon T above: I think the iPhone is a fantastic looking device, but the only thing it's done that no other phone has done before is actually get the networks to kick back a cut from their call revenues to Apple. You realise, by the way, that that's a breakthrough that you're paying extra for, right?
Touchscreen? Been around for years on Pocket PC phones, Palms etc. Internet access? Well, given that Apple gimped it by only providing GPRS/EDGE, and other phones have had 3G for a period of years now, I'm not that impressed. Yes, it has WiFi, but a) so do lots of other phones from Palm, HTC, Eten etc. and b) it's a fag to set up for each location and WiFi provider that you encounter - if you have a decent 3G phone and a decent contract, you don't need it anyway.
Frankly, I prefer the looks of my HTC Touch Dual, and having a proper keypad helps masses (I use the 20-key variant which has a keyboard more similar to a crackberry). I don't miss WiFi since I have HSDPA, it integrates properly with my hosted Exchange email service and even buying the handset SIM-free, and going on a month-by-month contract with 600 minutes and 1000 texts plus data access and even including that paid for email service, I'm still paying hundreds less than an iPhone subscriber over the duration. Oh, and if I don't like my contract I can change it with 30 days notice.
Apple have produced a superb looking device, as I say, and their marketing has been flawless. Maybe when they introduce the v2 with 3G (finally) it'll make more sense, but given the very restrictive and very expensive contract, I'd wonder about how much.
The Far Easterners were certainly impressive but there were some good British companies on show, too. The one that really seemed to be pushing boundaries was ITIS Holdings; they’re delivering a massive store of floating vehicle data to mobile phones and their website, Keepmoving.co.uk, already has plenty of members. It looks like an innovative use of data to provide traffic information before you start a journey, rather than relying on SatNav to send you straight into a tailback.