China and international censorship on World Press Freedom Day
Today is and during recent days we have learnt that ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ World News, our 24/7 international news channel, has been jammed by Chinese authorities during stories they regard as sensitive.
This included Damian Grammaticas' report yesterday on Chinese dissident Chen Guangcheng leaving the US embassy.
In order to see this content you need to have both Javascript enabled and Flash installed. Visit µþµþ°äÌý°Â±ð²ú·É¾±²õ±ð for full instructions. If you're reading via RSS, you'll need to visit the blog to access this content.
This deliberate electronic interference of the channel's distribution signal is just the latest in a long line of examples to block our impartial news and prevent it reaching audiences.
The ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳'s Chinese language website has been consistently blocked in China, apart from a brief respite during the 2008 Beijing Olympics, and our radio broadcasts in Mandarin were historically subject to persistent frequency interference for decades.
And these issues are certainly not just restricted to China.
In November, ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ World News was taken off-air in Pakistan by cable operators for broadcasting a documentary entitled Secret Pakistan.
³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ Persian TV has suffered deliberate interference to its broadcasting signals intermittently since its launch and the online service has consistently been blocked.
Other international broadcasters including Deutsche Welle and Voice of America have also been subject to deliberate electronic interference by the Iranian authorities.
In addition, in recent months, new tactics have been introduced which should be of deep concern to all those who believe in a free and independent international media.
This includes the intimidation of the families and acquaintances in Iran of ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ Persian's London-based staff. All journalists should be allowed to operate freely and any attempt to intimidate those known to them, is very concerning.
We strongly condemn these acts of censorship and harassment. The ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ has a long history of standing up to these attempts to prevent access to free media. This includes working closely with other international broadcasters to highlight these issues and encourage concerted international action.
We would again urge the countries where jamming, censorship and harassment emanates from, to stop these restrictive practices.
It is also imperative that the global community is doing all they can to counter attempts to block authoritative news.
The challenges that our international journalists face have never been so many and varied.
The ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ will continue to represent the voice of free media where there is no other access to fair and authoritative news - be it because of suppression and persecution of journalists, a growth in state sponsored media or attempts to jam or censor our news.
Today, on World Press Freedom Day, we repeat the call on international governments and the relevant regulatory bodies to put maximum pressure on those who seek to block access to trusted and independent news.
Peter Horrocks is director, ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ Global News
Comment number 1.
At 3rd May 2012, All for All wrote:Strong as China might be, the planet is shared, and global survival will need co-operation towards self-control for humanity.
Human response to destructive commercialism, nationalism and racism, as to any other manifestations of ignorance, fear, greed,corruption and aggression, has to be education and agreement on common interest in shared liberty.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 3rd May 2012, All for All wrote:Whatever the historical and immediate pressures upon us, we simply cannot afford organising principles rival to 'the human'.
China has no need to bow to claims of democratic liberty from countries disfigured by social inequality, but in all countries, for respect at home and abroad, any censorship should be 'measured' and clearly justifiable with respect to credible social threats.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 3rd May 2012, All for All wrote:History worldwide is stained by wrong-doing. None has monopoly of 'good example'. All are 'born ignorant', in need of socialisation & education
We may never be entirely free of need to confront bullying, at home, school, work, even across borders
Only social inclusion, with income-share equality, can liberate individuals and see the end of local 'gang-culture' & international suspicion
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 3rd May 2012, All for All wrote:Please keep talking, not just to visiting dignitaries, but to your own people and to people worldwide, of your thoughts and plans for democracy.
You will not just 'win friends', but help others to be worthy of friendship, at individual and state level.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 3rd May 2012, All for All wrote:The hard-won progress of millennia might seem at an end in the face of population size, social complexity, sophisticated power and temptation, but these very factors must soon determine the future of all, for self-destruction or resolution.
Leaders cannot be entirely 'responsible' for rogue officers, even rogue forces: but worthy leaders must show courage in investigation and correction.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 3rd May 2012, usernamefood wrote:About the censorship in China, That is up to them
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)
Comment number 7.
At 3rd May 2012, Michelle Summers wrote:It’s interesting that the high growth BRICS countries have major issues with freedom of the press, especially recently - I spotted an interesting article on a featured on ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ World last year - think this on it says it all!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 7)
Comment number 8.
At 3rd May 2012, Toonman wrote:Peter, one can only hope China heeds ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳'s call- I doubt whether it'll have any impact tho. Unfortunately, it's citizens that need to rise up a la Arab Spring against their leadership in order for such change to take place.
@Michelle (#7)- the article on the same blog is even more relevant
Complain about this comment (Comment number 8)
Comment number 9.
At 4th May 2012, Davemary wrote:China has their own law system and respect of human rights, i didn't feel any limitation or infringement of human freedom, but everybody should respect and follow the rule of law, I noticed / believe Mr. Chen did lot of things internally in China illegally, why only he has more consciousness of human rights but sticking out remarkably in China?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 9)
Comment number 10.
At 4th May 2012, Davemary wrote:what I want to say, this case again presents some kind of misunderstanding between western world forwards to China even generally China is developing very fast, if always put 'color glass' to look at one so-called 'communist' country in discriminative way will not be helpful,
take this case as tool to serve political trick is not good, I think.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 10)
Comment number 11.
At 4th May 2012, Olga Rikova wrote:Perhaps the ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ should extend its call to other countries in BRICS too - , for example, seems to be heading in the same direction as China.
@Davemary - it's not discriminating against China so much as trying to protect the human rights of its citizens.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 11)
Comment number 12.
At 4th May 2012, All for All wrote:All can be precipitate & intemperate; & all may find selves 'part of a system' we know or come to know as 'not right'
Painful to see selves 'wrong'; humbling to be 'seen wrong' by victims & others; frightening to be 'at risk of justice', earthly or 'divine'
Foolish 'not to see', not to comment if able, not somehow to act for Good
Vital, even if 'ahead', to set example of OWN progress
Complain about this comment (Comment number 12)
Comment number 13.
At 4th May 2012, englishvote wrote:A free press and the right to broadcast news to the people without government interference are indeed noble causes that we can and should support.
Unfortunately it has never been something the ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ itself has ever been very keen on.
³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ elitism and their set idealism, which often runs contrary to real life along with a desire to preach a ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ line is not the same as a free press
Complain about this comment (Comment number 13)
Comment number 14.
At 4th May 2012, englishvote wrote:When the broadcasters decides that their agenda is the truth and ignores the public as an irrelevance then democracy becomes just a dictatorship with votes.
Should the ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ be free to report the news ? Yes of course, that is vital.
Should the ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ decide what is best for the public to be told?
Should the ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ set the agenda and decide that the popular opinion of the people should not be reported?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 14)
Comment number 15.
At 4th May 2012, englishvote wrote:Be careful China, on your road to freedom and democracy nobody will report the risk of the media deciding that they know better than the people.
If you want the truth then don’t go looking for it in ivory towers.
With no oppression of the press and a freedom to report what they want the ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ has decided that British public opinion is inferior to their own.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 15)
Comment number 16.
At 4th May 2012, All for All wrote:englishvote @13-15
Key Debate
In good faith?
Key Question: 'good faith'... with whom?
Debating in 'social context' - accepting advantage in 'co-operation' - our deepest choice is between 'context of democracy' (rule Of, For, By The People), or 'other contexts' (species of dictatorship: autocratic, plutocratic, theocratic)
Democracy, if genuine Equal-Sharing, NECESSARILY 'benign': 'others' NOT
Complain about this comment (Comment number 16)
Comment number 17.
At 4th May 2012, All for All wrote:englishvote @15
"road to freedom"
Good to see "the people", as against the insulated (by "ivory" or other advantage tending to disqualify from 'understanding' and 'representation')
³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ has Charter & Agreement, subject to 'review', incorporating respect for the democracy as 'fundamental principle' (not just as self-appellation by the ignorant or oppressive)
Let us pray?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 17)
Comment number 18.
At 4th May 2012, englishvote wrote:China should learn from the ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳
Charge all their citizens £150 for the privilege of expressing their opinion in 400 characters or less.
Then claim it is a modern marvel of interactive media and they should appreciate having a free press!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 18)
Comment number 19.
At 4th May 2012, JunkkMale wrote:18. englishvote
Careful, may be deemed 'sensitive' by some in 'authority'. Not sure what diff between referral & blocking is, but House Rules will have it covered without any irony at all.
As to harassment, the letters those who opt out of getting the state system messaging receive from TV licensing seem pretty close.
Maybe it's all different, uniquely, somehow?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 19)
Comment number 20.
At 5th May 2012, BluesBerry wrote:How do you know who is jamming? How do you detect jamming and its precise source? How do you detect electronic interference, including the motivation? Incidentally this article, til now, is not reading "impartially".
I join you in strongly condemn these acts of censorship and harassment - whether they are initiated by the east or the west, and I believe the west is just as guilty, if not more.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 20)
Comment number 21.
At 5th May 2012, BluesBerry wrote:This is the one statement in your article with which I can agree totally: I join you in urging countries where jamming, censorship and harassment emanates from, to STOP these restrictive practices - be it an eastern country or a western country.
The ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ has done some reporting that deserves credit for excellence, but it has also, sometimes, leaned towards bias and in that bias lost the truth.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 21)
Comment number 22.
At 5th May 2012, BluesBerry wrote:Today, on World Press Freedom Day, I echo your appeal for all governments - east & west - to put maximum pressure on those who seek to block access to verified and independent news because only the truth can set us free.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 22)
Comment number 23.
At 5th May 2012, marquerite wrote:BRUNO in Campo dei Fiori, Roma! There's a brilliant piece by Alan Johnston in today's news (One Thousand Statues of Rome) and this is directly relevant to freedom of speech. Read it and burn with the shame of centuries.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 23)
Comment number 24.
At 5th May 2012, phillwuk wrote:Yes, the wrong place to comment, but there is no where else.
re: /news/world-europe-17964976 Has any one had the thought that filling balloons with Hydrogen (flammable) instead of Helium (inert) may have something to do with this? Helium filled balloons do not burn? - just a thought......
Complain about this comment (Comment number 24)
Comment number 25.
At 6th May 2012, thefrogstar wrote:³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ "impartial" reporting is not what it was.
I suggest you revisit the ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ reporting of the wire-fraud by Peter Gleick, ex Scientific Ethics chair of the AGU. The 'impartial' reporting of that was like watching a child ripping open the wrong Christmas present.
If I can't trust ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ impartiality about science-environment reporting, can I trust ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ reporting that I never see in foreign countries?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 25)