³ÉÈËÂÛ̳

³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ BLOGS - Test Match Special
« Previous | Main | Next »

Flintoff return overshadowed under the lights

Mark Mitchener Mark Mitchener | 22:20 UK time, Tuesday, 21 August 2007

England's followers have seen so many inconsistent performances and false dawns in one-day international cricket recently that it would take a brave man to proclaim that they had turned the corner after on Tuesday.

The inclusion of talisman Andrew Flintoff after ankle surgery was the pre-match talking point - but for once, he did not have to bear his country's hopes on his shoulders alone, as Alastair Cook and Ian Bell both hit centuries.

Not even a cloudy and cool evening could dampen the enthusiasm of the 20,000-strong crowd, which included plenty of flag-waving India supporters as well as the locals of Hampshire looking for a lift after their county's Friends Provident Trophy final defeat at the weekend.

Flintoff was not even needed to bat as Cook and Bell became the first pair of England batsmen to hit centuries in the same ODI since .

Cook and Bell's places in the one-day side had both been questioned by some before the game, especially when both were preferred to the more adventurous Owais Shah at the top of the order.

Alastair Cook and Ian Bell

But Cook more than doubled his previous best ODI score of 41, and reached three figures in the 40th over of the innings - earning a standing ovation, followed by another when he was yorked by RP Singh two overs later.

Bell was a little more carefree than his partner, outscored Cook during their second-wicket stand of 178, reached his century off exactly 100 balls and batted through the rest of the innings to finish with 126.

While other countries continue to concentrate on attack rather than defence in the opening overs, England's initially pedestrian pace, reminiscent of the World Cup, seemed to be a hangover from the era.

However, the run rate steadily rose, with the occasional boundary to excite the crowd - and if the game plan was to reach the last 20 overs with plenty of wickets in hand, then it worked.

There was a sense of anticipation around Southampton at the interval - albeit tempered with the knowledge of the huge ODI experience of India's batting line-up, well used to chasing targets under lights. Would 288 be enough?

Opening pair Sourav Ganguly and Sachin Tendulkar came into the match averaging nearly 50 as a partnership, but they managed just 15 as a run-out by the unlikely Monty Panesar saw off Ganguly.

James Anderson then found Gautham Gambhir's outside edge for his 100th ODI wicket - and after an amusing interlude involving a group of girls in bikinis being chased around the stands by stewards, Anderson's 101st and 102nd followed in quick succession as he removed Tendulkar and Yuvraj Singh.

Flintoff began the game at second slip, but India were already reeling at 35-4 after 12 overs when he was introduced into the attack, and he was soon charging in at nearly 90mph.

A total of five no-balls from his seven overs was a mild concern, but a great diving stop in his second over showed no sign of any reaction to the ankle problem.

The England line-up contained several players with differing claims to all-rounder status - certainly Collingwood and , while bowling and Stuart Broad's batting may yet earn them that tag in the future.

But Flintoff remains the only England player who fits the strict all-rounder criteria as someone who could earn his place via either batting or bowling alone - and thus is vital to the balance of the side.

The Lancastrian also had Mahendra Dhoni - who had positively crawled by his own high standards to score just 19 off 60 balls, in a torrid stand with Dravid - caught behind to complete a successful comeback.

As well as Anderson's 4-23, coach Peter Moores would also have been encouraged by Mascarenhas (1-28), who bowled tightly in the middle overs on his home ground and was eventually rewarded with the prize wicket of Dravid, his first ODI scalp.

Bopara, one of the finds of the World Cup, also undoubtedly improves England in the field, despite not being required to bat or bowl on this occasion.

India were also capable of self-inflicted wounds, as two more run-outs - including the farcical scenes when Dinesh Karthik and Piyush Chawla ended up at the same end - accelerated their downfall, while many spectators also took the opportunity to beat an early retreat to avoid the traffic.

Make no mistake, it was a great night for England - but can they keep it going?

°ä´Ç³¾³¾±ð²Ô³Ù²õÌýÌýPost your comment

  • 1.
  • At 10:28 PM on 21 Aug 2007,
  • Mark wrote:

Great start.

Good to see Cook and Bell getting their 1st centuries which will help confidence.

Nice to see Anderson and Freddie back bowling well.

  • 2.
  • At 10:37 PM on 21 Aug 2007,
  • Mr Popodopolous wrote:

Wow!

What a win, England showed just what they were capable of in ODI Cricket tonight, although it has to be said also trhat India did not turn up.

More of the same for Bristol on Friday please!

:D

  • 3.
  • At 12:42 AM on 22 Aug 2007,
  • Ravi Bala wrote:

i think India will lose this series 5-2 because England has home reserves to draw upon. India has a restrcited list with injuries

RuvaBulu

  • 4.
  • At 12:58 AM on 22 Aug 2007,
  • Chris wrote:

Such a strong position after 30 overs - should really have got to 300. But the Indians' blood couldn't cope with the chilly breeze & they self destructed.

The Rose Bowl - a complete joke for international sport. 30 minutes to get down the off-ramp of the M27. Temporary stands, temporary loos that were overflowing at half time, nowhere to wash your hands. The loos right next to (5m?) the food - charming!

Arriving from the west (M3) you are directed past the ground to parking on the East. The busses then take you back past the ground to the West gate. You then have to troop the long way 3/4 round the ground to seats in the East stand because there is no way past the members enclosure. For pete's sake dont have a test there - it is a pitiful setup.

  • 5.
  • At 09:58 AM on 22 Aug 2007,
  • Paul wrote:

Agree with this all - great to see Freddie back and the team scoring runs. I had been knocking both Bell and Cook before hand so shows what I know!

If there was one small concern it was Monty. It seems to me he still has some work to do on the one day form of the game - a bit more variety poss. Good test player with the potential to become a really good one but just not convinced at the moment about this form.

  • 6.
  • At 10:59 AM on 22 Aug 2007,
  • ryan wrote:

Despite our recent one day showings i thought we might do pretty well in this series because we will feel robbed of that first Test at Lords, our bowling - despite losing the tests 1-0 - has surely been better overall than India's, and we have much fitter younger players all-round. Predictions are always really dodgy but shall i tempt fate and say definitely 4-3 to England, and maybe even 5-2?

  • 7.
  • At 11:24 AM on 22 Aug 2007,
  • Howard wrote:

Dear Mark,

please look up "torrid" in the dictionary and see whether you still think it describes Dravid and Singh's stand.

H

  • 8.
  • At 11:50 AM on 22 Aug 2007,
  • will wrote:

I think Mark may have meant 'turgid' rather than 'torrid'...

  • 9.
  • At 11:53 AM on 22 Aug 2007,
  • Andrew wrote:

"Flintoff ... was soon charging in at nearly 90mph."

So Flintoff was running in faster than many fast bowlers bowl?

Now that is scary!

  • 10.
  • At 12:00 PM on 22 Aug 2007,
  • Aaron wrote:

India were poor yesterday, make no mistake they will see yesterday as a poor day at the office.

England have been known for the odd good ODi performance but not bein able to maintain it we saw this in the ODIS against the West Indies.

My prediction at the start of the series was 5-2 India and I still think thats how it will end up.

  • 11.
  • At 12:43 PM on 22 Aug 2007,
  • honeyb wrote:

I don't think England should get carried away with this...Although they played almost perfectly to win does not mean they would play that way day in day out. Make no mistake...they played extremely well..but closer inspection would reveal the truth. The reason England could get to 280 was because they had so many wickets in hand going into the last 15...but rarely would you have that many wickets in a one day game which makes the start more important. The difference between a score of 60/0 and 80/1 after 15 is huge in ODI cricket. Most teams would take the latter while England happily settle for the earlier. India played poorly yesterday. If they bowled to their potential they would have restricted to 250 and if they had batted to their potential they would have got that with ease..So no matter how well England played they still rely on their opponents playing badly. I still think England could win the series..India have gone backwards in ODI cricket... actualy this could make this series more interesting!

  • 12.
  • At 12:45 PM on 22 Aug 2007,
  • Alex T wrote:

There's quite a few people doing the doomsday scenario... How about this?

- Our bowlers outperformed theirs tenfold. Each one of ours, with the possible exception of Collingwood, did exceedingly well.
- Our fielding was spot on. Three run outs? Panesar involved in two of them... Cook sealing his ton with an extraordinary catch at gully? Fantastic!
- Our batting was sublime. Maybe a few extra runs in the last ten overs, but then we still had KP, Colly, Flintoff, Bopara, Broad in the pavilion!

Will we win the series? Heaven knows - I hope so... But can't we just enjoy one victory at a time, especially as it was such a great, all-round, effort!

  • 13.
  • At 01:32 PM on 22 Aug 2007,
  • Akber A. Kassam. wrote:

Congratulations Team England, impressive win over Team India by 104 runs in first ODI at Rose Bowl. Keep up the good work.!!!!

india wil be back mont panerser and peersen and cok and ian bel

  • 15.
  • At 05:15 PM on 22 Aug 2007,
  • Neil wrote:

I was there and it was a good game and a game that when we fielded, we bossed.

In regards to the ground, I can echo your issues, my mum is disabled and the one and only disabled car park was the other side of the ground to the block f tickets we were allocated. on top of this, i was sat 15 feet from the girls in the bikinis. at first it started off innocently and then as time went on, more and more of their clothing seemed to be removed until a steward interveined and put a stop to it all. the girls then went and peace was restored until the india innings when the girls reappeared and then promptly stripped down to their bikini tops and hot pants and when stewards stepped in, the girls ran around the stand. the stewards had no grip on the situation and as it turned out, shamefully allowed the promotion of a company where you have to text one of these 5 digit text numbers for the entire time they had been in the ground (tshirts with logos etc).

I was there for the cricket and not for watching the stewards unable to control 6 females.

On top of this, no buggies were available at the end to transport my mum back to the disabled car park and as for the facilities, the most annoying bit was the natwest fun part (the bowling and fielding tent) was placed outside the ticket controls so once you were in you couldn't get back out to them.

All in all, it was extremely poor planning by The Rose Bowl and left me somewhat disappointed.

  • 16.
  • At 05:46 PM on 22 Aug 2007,
  • Jim wrote:

Was at the game last night and must say the atmosphere was buzzing. As a Hampshire fan I feel this display more than makes up for the drubbing on Saturday. It was, I thought, quite apparent that England were far superior in the field with the Indians consistently failing to contain Bell and Cook who were always looking for the easy single. When England were fielding the ball was being slammed into Prior's gloves with interest. Not something Dhoni could claim. Top stuff!

  • 17.
  • At 07:57 PM on 22 Aug 2007,
  • Theodogdinho wrote:

Don't forget that despite our poor show at the World Cup, we won the ODI series against Australia and New Zealand last winter.

A bit more of this and some consistency is what I'll be hoping for when I'm at Edgbaston on Monday to see if Bell can get an ODI ton on his home ground.

Depending on the weather, naturally!!!

  • 18.
  • At 05:37 PM on 23 Aug 2007,
  • Milind Rajput wrote:

Congrats England.It was one way traffic all the way.
Bell and Cook played excellent and Anderson bowled his best.
But for how long.????
India is bound to bounce back and they are dangerous.This was a wake up call.
Can one expect England players to perform such extraordinarily daily for next 3 ODI to enable them to take series.

well done england, especially cooky (great catch too) and belly. lets just hope you can keep it up for next time

  • 20.
  • At 12:38 AM on 24 Aug 2007,
  • Sachin Tandel wrote:

The way England played its opener was really nice. This win will definitely help the English players to forget the test series. Well though this is just the beginning as team India will definitely bounce back within couple of matches. As it happened quite frequently in the past. The blues have done great job so far in the test series and they will continue the tour with the more wins in the one day matches. Definitely now the one day series will be more interesting with the clash of the star players in both teams. And it will be an interesting all round series.

  • 21.
  • At 02:30 AM on 24 Aug 2007,
  • John wrote:

Well done, but like any series, this is only Game 1. No one has won a Stanley Cup (that's for ice hockey FYI) on the first match, and I am positive that trend won't start here.

It's good to see Bell and Cook hit those big scores -- hopefully this will mean more of the same in the next matches. Maybe this time, we could see England even post a 300+ total?

  • 22.
  • At 01:59 PM on 24 Aug 2007,
  • Simon wrote:

Yep, well done with the analogy there John. Of course no-one is going to start winning the Stanley Cup in this series as it appears to be CRICKET that they are playing.

Ooh! I've got another one

No-one ever won the FA cup in the qualifying round and that's not going to start here.

Anyone prefer my incisive comments?

  • 23.
  • At 08:50 PM on 25 Aug 2007,
  • crazyfire wrote:

Hello Mark,
If you feel England has a great night then i wish England similar GREAT nights for rest of the series.

Indian fan

  • 24.
  • At 08:53 PM on 25 Aug 2007,
  • crazyfire wrote:

Ryan...agreed England outplayed India in First test..however England was beaten badly in the second test. In third test too England were not given follow on (a big mistake by India). So 2 times England was outplayed by India. the result should have been 2-1 (India - England)

  • 25.
  • At 08:56 PM on 25 Aug 2007,
  • crazyfire wrote:

India is not in best One day form...surely their batting, bowling and fielding is all inconsistent and I am glad about it. Everytime India start this way in a series they go on to win the series. Their performance improves with every game in the series...you will see... its 5-2 for India.

  • 26.
  • At 09:08 AM on 29 Aug 2007,
  • LEONIDAS LOS wrote:

IT WAS THE STEADY TEAM EFFORT THAT WON THE GAME FOR ENGLAND. PRETTY GOOD BATTING, PRETTY GOOD BOWLING (TREMLETT DID GET HIT AROUND BUT DON'T FORGET THAT HE GOT TWO CRUCIAL WICKETS ) BUT ABOVE ALL EXCELLENT FIELDING THAT MADE THE CAPTAIN'S TASK MUCH EASIER.

AS A TEAM THEY HAVE DEPTH.IF THEY CAN KEEP THIS CONSISTENCY, THIS WILL SERVE THEM TO GO A LONG WAY AND WIN MANY MORE MATCHES.

LEONIDAS

  • 27.
  • At 12:11 PM on 29 Aug 2007,
  • Mango Man wrote:

good to see freddie back, i guess. even better to see cook and bell getting their first centuries. tremlett rocks! collingwood is doing well as captain. be nice to see pietersen get back his form. hope england keeps up the good stuff.

Thanks to Oprah, Obama camp claims biggest crowd yet

This post is closed to new comments.

³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ iD

³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ navigation

³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ © 2014 The ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.