1st Test day two - rolling blog
Ashes heroes take a bow
While today's players tucked into isotonic beverages and carbo-bars at tea, tributes were being paid to heroes of previous Ashes battles on the Cardiff outfield.
The occasion? The induction of Tom Graveney, Peter May and Ian Chappell into the ICC's Cricket Hall of Fame.
Graveney and Chappell were there to doff their commemorative caps to all corners, May's widow Virginia to receive his. And if any of the three players had been at their playing peak, they'd have been absolute certs for selection this time around.
Graveney's Ashes record is something to turn Freddie and KP green with envy - three series wins. May scored 1,566 runs against the old enemy in 21 Tests, averaging 46 at a time when 40 was considered the mark of a class batsman.
Chappell's stats are even better: 2,138 runs in 30 Ashes Tests, including four tons and 14 half-centuries. He was a key part of the Australia side that destroyed England 4-1 in the 1974-5 series down under and then went on to retain them in the next showdown.
Cardiff stood to applaud them, and as it did, idle thoughts turned to which of the current players will one day join them in the pantheon.
Ponting, certainly. Flintoff, possibly. Pietersen - well, he'd be furious if he doesn't.
Fancy-dress fans
About time we had a little colour in this blog, no?
A little post-lunch dash around the ground always yields a decent harvest, and Thursday by the Taff was no exception.
Worried before the series that Australian fans wouldn't be up for this?
Rest easy. This bloke's gone bananas.
At times on the first afternoon it got a little quiet.
Not anymore. After that flaying from the England tail-enders and the spicy start to Australia's innings, there was a carnival atmosphere in Cardiff.
Wouldn't want to be sitting behind that plume, would you? You would?
Hughes the new kid
Thursday lunchtime, and the first joust in an Ashes Test for the much-vaunted young opener Phillip Hughes.
The 20-year-old's form and pedigree have been one of the most intriguing sub-plots in the build-up to this series. Hayden gone, Langer at Taunton - whether the new leftie succeeds or fails over the next seven weeks could have a big impact on which way the result goes.
So how did he look?
His first ball against England was a nasty one - a rapid inswinger from Anderson that had him jumping high and wearing one on the thigh pad - but he soon settled into the groove he found in his .
When Stuart Broad dropped short, Hughes cut and drove off the back foot for two early fours. Broad was aiming to repeat the short, nasty stuff dished out by , but there was too much width and Hughes raced to 22 from his first 26 balls.
Hughes' style is substance over beauty. There's a wide, open stance, a whole heap of twitching as the bowler enters his delivery stride and a little back foot stepaway towards the leg stump to give himself room.
Of early nerves there was little sign. He was happy to hog the strike off his more experienced partner Simon Katich, facing every ball but one in the first four overs, and soon forced Andrew Strauss to push Ravi Bopara from backward point out into a boundary-saving sweeper slot.
There's been questions about how well Hughes moves his feet against spinners. When Strauss turned to Graeme Swann in the last two overs before lunch, the tyro kept the aggression housed and went watchful to the interval.
28 not out at the break. As starts go, it's rock solid.
The tail that wags
Is there anything that hurts a toiling team quite as much as being ?
Before the start of play, the consensus was that England needed to get past 380 to get full value for batting first on this track, but even their most rabid supporters didn't expect Stuart Broad and Jimmy Anderson - and then Graeme Swann - to lay waste with quite as much joyous success as they did.
40 runs off the first six overs of the day. A partnership between Anderson and Swann of 50 off their first 38 balls together.
In a Test like this, when the two teams are so evenly matched, these sort of last-gasp stands can make all the difference between victory and defeat.
It's not merely the runs on the board, but also the way the momentum is seized. The Cardiff crowd was quiet at the start, wondering whether and Peter Siddle would rattle through the remaining three English wickets before the Aussie openers piled on the runs.
Half an hour into the day, it had all changed - fans on their feet, flags being waved, songs being sung. Reverse sweeps from a no.8 tend to have that effect. It doesn't do any harm that had a face even darker than the clouds lurking over Cardiff Bay.
For England supporters these feel like bonus runs. But as 2005 taught us, they could turn out to be as important as anything contributed by the established top six.
NB I'll have eyes on this blog all day, so pile in for a chin-wag whenever the mood takes.
Comment number 1.
At 9th Jul 2009, Jimmy Mac wrote:Excellent start to the day, although surprised to see the next ³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ Online poll is "Who has been Australia's best bowler" without an "All of them as I'm Graeme Swann" option!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 9th Jul 2009, U14063792 wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 9th Jul 2009, whatbill wrote:Great stuff from the tail this morning. Whether it sets us up for a win or just makes it harder for the aussies to overhaul us remains to be seen though. With less than 4 sessions gone, all 3 results are still very possible...
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 9th Jul 2009, walrus wrote:There are somethings in life you can depend on: death, taxes and an England tail-end collapse. Anyway, I'm off to file my income tax form.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 9th Jul 2009, U14062323 wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 9th Jul 2009, Tom Fordyce wrote:whatbill - where's your cash at this point?
walrus - what was collapsing about that?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)
Comment number 7.
At 9th Jul 2009, commentarypox wrote:Well tail only wagged because the pitch is slow an innocuous lets watch Hughes spank the attack for rest of the day. Cant believe the the biased commentary from Botham and co. Doctorow's decisions are dodgy.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 7)
Comment number 8.
At 9th Jul 2009, Ceejay_F1 wrote:Looks like England's bowlers are going to let the aussies of the hook - lets hope that a lunch time chat about line and length sharpens them up or else all the great work of the tail will be wasted.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 8)
Comment number 9.
At 9th Jul 2009, Zombie_Rick wrote:Great morning so far, I agree with Ceejay_F1 we really need to pull something out now, cant let the Aussies pull it back.....I couldn't live with the shame at work tomorrow!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 9)
Comment number 10.
At 9th Jul 2009, andrewtheboom wrote:Great batting from Swann and Anderson, big total for Australia to get now, but very ominous start from Hughes.
Suprised to see Swann come on, not Flintoff, especially as Katich is Australia's best player of spin.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 10)
Comment number 11.
At 9th Jul 2009, Gatz42 wrote:Yo Tom
Great stuff by swann and co (first time we've had such a strong tail batting-wise since you-know-when) but I can't shake this horrible premonition the Aussies are going to rack up a big one, especially on this wicket. After 2 series against the barely competative West Indies (one of which we managed to lose anyway) reckon this will be the first real test of Strauss's captaincy mettle. Fingers crossed he passes but I have my doubts. Looking okay at mo though
Complain about this comment (Comment number 11)
Comment number 12.
At 9th Jul 2009, hackerjack wrote:Suprised to see Swann come on, not Flintoff, especially as Katich is Australia's best player of spin.
----
Nah, two overs before lunch Swann was the right choice just to give them somethign different to think about.
Now we get 4 overs each of Anderson & Broad after lunch before Freddie gets chucked the ball for a firey six over spell that will hopefully rip through the Aussies streaky spine in no time at all :o). The crowd will go nuts when he comes on, why waste that on a couple overs before lunch.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 12)
Comment number 13.
At 9th Jul 2009, Tom Fordyce wrote:CeejayF1 - seen that first over from Freddie to Hughes> A maiden that nearly cut him in half three times.
andrewtheboom - you've got your wish...
Complain about this comment (Comment number 13)
Comment number 14.
At 9th Jul 2009, Ceejay_F1 wrote:Yes - Freddie clearly had something in his lunchtime juice - real fiery stuff
Complain about this comment (Comment number 14)
Comment number 15.
At 9th Jul 2009, Tom Fordyce wrote:Never underestimate the Fred factor. Hughes looked untroubled before lunch; against Flintoff he was in trouble from the start.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 15)
Comment number 16.
At 9th Jul 2009, battystampsagain wrote:Excuse me - but is one the Superhero's drinking with his left hand between 11am - and 3pm - fined - and to commentarypox direct - mmmm - really watched Hughes spank - not....
Complain about this comment (Comment number 16)
Comment number 17.
At 9th Jul 2009, Slater582 wrote:"Wouldn't want to be sitting behind that plume, would you? You would?""
Oh yes.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 17)
Comment number 18.
At 9th Jul 2009, smaherron wrote:So much for all the adverse comments about the Aussie spinner.
He got the ball to turn. Neither Swann nor Panesar did
Complain about this comment (Comment number 18)